Round 1 Buttonwillow Sat Race #2

jaybocc2

o lento
No need to nuke 300's, think those are popular bikes and deserve their own class, without bigger bikes racing with them at same time.
Talking about nuking how about classes for bikes that don't exist or race any more, like 750. It is 600 class now which makes 5 classes for them to race on sunday (without counting F40 and FP). Wonder how many do all 5, I bet nobody.
Talking about picking, choosing and consolidating, start right there.

Sure, could be cut, except cutting 750 sbk and sstk doesn't fix this problem as they run with the 1000s ... And i don't think getting turned to red mist by a 1000 is gonna help the safety issue.

IMO best option is to submit a petition to fix it or attend BOD meeting make damn sure they hear you and/or run for the BOD next year since the current BOD isn't resolving this to their satisfaction / desired timeline.
 

TWF

training hard
Sure, could be cut, except cutting 750 sbk and sstk doesn't fix this problem as they run with the 1000s ...

It does. Get rid of 750sstk or/and 750sb and legacy classes and you got rid of at least one race on sunday.
What a fuck is this legacy shit with bikes made between 02-07? (06gsxr1k is just fine in any open classes) It is either super dino or regular class, no need for in between.
 

scratchpad

Well-known member
Prior to the race at Round 1 i spoke with Max and Jordan about this 5 wave issue. Ive seen it in the past and knew it would be an issue.

Round 2 there was still 5 waves. After the race i spoke with Dave M. and Berto regarding not only this 5 wave issue but spoke with Berto about other stuff as well i think should be addressed.

The races for me was much like a bowling ball dodging bowling pins. IIRC it started right around the lap 2 mark. I can only speak for myself but if im showing up to compete in anything or race whether its club or MA im doing the best i can to get on or the top of the podium. It isnt about the trophies for me, they are all in the trash somewhere.

If youre showing up to the races to go around in circles or so you can tell your friends you race perhaps trackdays are a better option. You can go around in A group at a C group pace.
 

scratchpad

Well-known member
I havnt dived into it yet but perhaps cutoff times should be re-evaluated. Also, with consideration given to race starts with multiple waves and the time in between wave race starts.
 

stangmx13

not Stan
at Rd 2, there was a delayed wave in one of the races i was in. it made it very hairy to catch larger groups much sooner in the race. a few riders complained, but its not like anything will change with that. and slightly related, im severely disappointed with F1/F4 qualifying. i was forced to deal with more than a few moves on track that i wouldnt expect from Expert racers. but i suspect my expectations are too high given my racing experience(s). those 2 situations make it clear that a 5 wave race is absurd. i cant imagine what the leaders of that race are dealing with.

IMO, AFM uses diff-wave starts too much. not enough same-flag starts for diff classes.
 

Holeshot

Super Moderator
Staff member
The same day after round 2 race I went to Barbara (race director) to air my displeasure with 5 waves and she sent me to Jordan Edgington (rider rep) He admitted to me its a problem that needs fixing. Than went to Dave Moss (BOD) same day same thing. He said he would talk to Ali about putting it on agenda monday morning. Than talked to Lisa Kinberger (BOD) same thing. Yet here we are. AFM are you REALLY listening??????

Yeah, if you can read this, someone is listening. I had Allie open the registration as early as possible because with the new system we can. When she sets it up, she has to put a race order in the system (which can be changed later). I didn't want to open things later. This problem we're still working through.

AFM: All For Me...

My first thought was to put us with F40 HVWT/F40 MDWT. Make us 3rd wave as a test/tryout. After race get feedback from us and them and go from there. No one came to us about feedback for our race last round cause they would of got an earful which they did anyway. Being that it would only be about 6-8 bikes for the fast guys to catch as well as we would be spread out I don't see it being a big deal but I will let them (hvwt/mdwt) say how it turned out.

What kind of times are you running Mike at Thill or BW?

I'm thinking we can launch 400/350 as one wave and afemme LW/ clubman LW as one wave. Does that seem as if it would help?

who's running this club? the racers? I don't expect a customer (racers are customers) to have to come up w/ a solution for a safety issue.

perhaps the best way to fix this issue is electing someone that will take care of it.

It's not racers coming up a solution: it's using the brain power of the members with ideas for their own grids. The best knowledge and ideas many times comes from those ON the grid, not those watching the grid. They know how the bikes stack up among one another at different points on the track, hence the request for ideas.

No man is an island for alleviating problems. We're a club. Our best asset: each other.

I havnt dived into it yet but perhaps cutoff times should be re-evaluated. Also, with consideration given to race starts with multiple waves and the time in between wave race starts.

Not a bad point. We did away with cutoff times this year and that may be one of the issues. That being said, we DO pull very slow riders from the track. Barb has that authority universally.

Perhaps AFemme/AFemme LWT/Clubman LWT could have its own Race #4 on Saturday.

Barb has said we do not have time. I'm not totally convinced at that.

at Rd 2, there was a delayed wave in one of the races i was in. it made it very hairy to catch larger groups much sooner in the race. a few riders complained, but its not like anything will change with that. and slightly related, im severely disappointed with F1/F4 qualifying. i was forced to deal with more than a few moves on track that i wouldnt expect from Expert racers. but i suspect my expectations are too high given my racing experience(s). those 2 situations make it clear that a 5 wave race is absurd. i cant imagine what the leaders of that race are dealing with.

IMO, AFM uses diff-wave starts too much. not enough same-flag starts for diff classes.

That delayed launch was due to a bike down from the first wave in T2, I was told. They cleared the bike quickly before launching our wave.

The AFM is not WERA. Grid are larger this year than last year by a significant margin. F1/ F4 qualifying is not ideal...it hurt me too, but given my expectations are less than yours and racing experience, more than yours, I'm thinking we have different formulas on "experience". After F1/F4 qualifying I did start to work on how to separate those two, but don't have an answer yet. I likely will by round 3, but there's more pressing needs which are the focus of this thread.

We have too many different classes, IMO, too high track costs and not enough racers who are up to the task to pay the true freight. You brought up the idea of putting new leadership in. Trust me on this Robert: it wouldn't hurt my feelings one bit.

Keeping things going in this club is a constant tight-rope effort. This is the first season where we (the board) have felt comfortable in our attendance. Let's hope the economy keeps rolling on and guys like you keep coming out and not spending too much money chasing Moto America grids.
 
Last edited:

#1Spies Fan

Well-known member
Not a bad point. We did away with cutoff times this year and that may be one of the issues. That being said, we DO pull very slow riders from the track. Barb has that authority universally.



I will keep an eye out for this in round#3..there are a few that I saw in Round#1 that should have been pulled from the track...one person is well known as very slow and is running 25 sec a lap off the pace of someone mid pack...this will be an issue when we go to Sears point due to blind spots and a tighter track...
 

RACER774

Well-known member
Anything would help. Before when our race was only 3 waves total I don't think we were complaining or was a problem. DONE problem solved IMHO!! I second..Any objections... none.... great ayes have it...Thanks Berto
 
Last edited:

stangmx13

not Stan
It's not racers coming up a solution: it's using the brain power of the members with ideas for their own grids. The best knowledge and ideas many times comes from those ON the grid, not those watching the grid. They know how the bikes stack up among one another at different points on the track, hence the request for ideas.

do u really believe that? based on all the thoughts posted in this thread, do u really think that any customer has enough knowledge to come up with a solution? the solution will ultimately need to balance revenue, safety, the needs of all the customers that arent in here, time constraints, revenue, and plenty more.

its ez for me to recognize that I don't know shit about most of that. I can present complaints and maybe some broad ideas. but id never expect any of my ideas to be the best for the club because im not informed beyond the racing. asking more than that of other racers seems like a bad idea.

plus, someone needs to own this issue and its solution. that can't (shouldn't?) be any of the customers.

We have too many different classes, IMO, too high track costs and not enough racers who are up to the task to pay the true freight. You brought up the idea of putting new leadership in. Trust me on this Robert: it wouldn't hurt my feelings one bit.

Keeping things going in this club is a constant tight-rope effort. This is the first season where we (the board) have felt comfortable in our attendance. Let's hope the economy keeps rolling on and guys like you keep coming out and not spending too much money chasing Moto America grids.

funny thing is that I don't actually think new leadership is a good idea.

IMO, the whole elected board is a terrible idea. a business needs the best most-qualified people leading, not an inexperienced person that can win a popularity contest. im sure im exaggerating slightly, but hopefully u get my point. however, since the board isnt going away, keep the current one so the people can become experienced and most-qualified. throwing that away over this issue prob isnt smart.
 
Last edited:
Not a bad point. We did away with cutoff times this year and that may be one of the issues. That being said, we DO pull very slow riders from the track. Barb has that authority universally.



I will keep an eye out for this in round#3..there are a few that I saw in Round#1 that should have been pulled from the track...one person is well known as very slow and is running 25 sec a lap off the pace of someone mid pack...this will be an issue when we go to Sears point due to blind spots and a tighter track...

for someone interested in racing it really sucks that there is no minimum pace requirement....
 

frozenuts

I make words too.
for someone interested in racing it really sucks that there is no minimum pace requirement....

The interest in racing extends beyond the uber fast, which is why club racing exists. If only the fastest of the fast were allowed to race, you would only be able to do track days.
 

jaybocc2

o lento
The interest in racing extends beyond the uber fast, which is why club racing exists. If only the fastest of the fast were allowed to race, you would only be able to do track days.
This ^^^^

for someone interested in racing it really sucks that there is no minimum pace requirement....

Also this has been discussed... well at least how to know when you're ready to race...
https://www.bayarearidersforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=514728
 
Last edited:

Tumbleweed

rollin' right along.....
for someone interested in racing it really sucks that there is no minimum pace requirement....

Go race Jacob. :teeth It's hardly C-group out there. Not even B-group. It's A-group on steroids....and then there's the AA-group, doubled up on steroids - they will pass you faster than a blink.

There maybe a rather random "easy pass," but that also depends on the race you are in....


I'm thinking we can launch 400/350 as one wave and afemme LW/ clubman LW as one wave. Does that seem as if it would help?

I didn't quote all of Berto's giant post, but there are a LOT of excellent points in there. IMO, YES the wave combo mentioned above would help. It would eliminate the 5-waves, and I would think those groupings are compatible time-wise.

My initial concern was for new women racers, since the AFemme has traditionally been the best (safest) place to get started - the "women's clubman." But grouping the AFemmeLT with the CMLT would create a potential wave of 7-14-sh riders....based on the last BW races - I would actually suggest this would be a better true race experience for any of the first-time racers in that wave (both AFemme and CMLT). It is not a big-600cc sized grid, and it wouldn't be a tiny grid of one. My very first race was in AFemme (before there was a AFemmeLT), and I was in a race all by myself. :wave I am certain that gave me the best initial perspective I could get....and I got a shiny-sparklie to go home with, but I definitely didn't get any perspective of actually "racing" in my solo race. However, since I don't race AFemme currently (at least until AFM makes a AFemme450 class :rofl), the opinion of an AFemmeLT is potentially more appropriate (?)
 

TWF

training hard
The interest in racing extends beyond the uber fast, which is why club racing exists. If only the fastest of the fast were allowed to race, you would only be able to do track days.
Which is why you have different classes and experts/novices. It has nothing to do with this thread. Issue is not fast or slow but about putting wrong classes together.
 

sckego

doesn't like crashing
However, since I don't race AFemme currently (at least until AFM makes a AFemme450 class :rofl), the opinion of an AFemmeLT is potentially more appropriate (?)

Don't 450s just go with Lightweight?

Lightweight: ......Formula Ill, Formula IV, (Buell XB9 per Formula IV is
allowed), 350 Superbike, 250 Legacy. 450 Superbike, Lightweight Twins, Formula Twins 650, Formula Singles, Super Dinosaur (up to 600cc), and Vintage.
 

Tumbleweed

rollin' right along.....
Don't 450s just go with Lightweight?

Lightweight: ......Formula Ill, Formula IV, (Buell XB9 per Formula IV is
allowed), 350 Superbike, 250 Legacy. 450 Superbike, Lightweight Twins, Formula Twins 650, Formula Singles, Super Dinosaur (up to 600cc), and Vintage.

Yep - I just prefer the F40LT race (which grids the same time as the AFemmeLT). My suggestion that the opinion of someone that actually races the AFemmeLT is probably more important than mine was based on the thought that they worked hard to get an "AFemmeLT Class" last year.... I could grid there, I just choose not to.

...and the AFemme450 class was just a weee-joke :teeth
 
Last edited:

Holeshot

Super Moderator
Staff member
for someone interested in racing it really sucks that there is no minimum pace requirement....

Wait, are we talking Karting?

Anything would help. Before when our race was only 3 waves total I don't think we were complaining or was a problem. DONE problem solved IMHO!! I second..Any objections... none.... great ayes have it...Thanks Berto

Let's try it and report back how it works (or doesn't work). The best bet is to try different things that are vetted before we try them..hence the reason we appreciate the input and think tank approach. It's not as if the entirety of the board races in the races which aren't staged together in the best manner. Aaron's approach on Sunday was good and we talked about doing something to alleviate the issues. We'll still have some slower riders, but with the strong economy and influx of new racers, this is the byproduct, unfortunately.

do u really believe that? based on all the thoughts posted in this thread, do u really think that any customer has enough knowledge to come up with a solution? the solution will ultimately need to balance revenue, safety, the needs of all the customers that arent in here, time constraints, revenue, and plenty more.

plus, someone needs to own this issue and its solution. that can't (shouldn't?) be any of the customers.

funny thing is that I don't actually think new leadership is a good idea.

IMO, the whole elected board is a terrible idea. a business needs the best most-qualified people leading, not an inexperienced person that can win a popularity contest. im sure im exaggerating slightly, but hopefully u get my point. however, since the board isnt going away, keep the current one so the people can become experienced and most-qualified. throwing that away over this issue prob isnt smart.

Me personally, I'm a group think type. It drives some board members bonkers (and has driven plenty of board members bonkers in the past) that I let discussions take place that tend to ramble. However many times, we strike upon a problem we didn't know we had or hit on an idea that's worthy. It allows us to be fluid in are thinking and solutions, IMO, but it does frustrate those who are linear and organized in their solution plan. We've got lots of experienced riders who read these threads and provide good input that only they have the experience to provide. It's a help, I think.

Good thoughts on boards VS private business, but it is the structure it is. Having moved to full time running our national company, I have to use my time more sparingly. Fortunately, as you've keyed on, our board is excellent and our workers are excellent at picking up slack and working hard and intelligently.

My helmet is truly off to our board and workers. They're excellent. I'd be fortunate to have them working in our own company. I'm also fortunate to race alongside you Robert...it's been great fun, FWIW.


The interest in racing extends beyond the uber fast, which is why club racing exists. If only the fastest of the fast were allowed to race, you would only be able to do track days.

I'm with Max, Jacob. Plus the fact that the paddock is FILLED with all these cool people, some who aren't the fastest of riders is what really makes the AFM a place people go to spend the weekend and don't even ride! The club RULES so hard!

As does Peepshowrandom.com
 
Last edited:
Really not my place to speak....

I have found that i can go to the Mylaps race results and set my own desired minimum pace based on those lap times so im good....
 
Top