instagram will soon have the right sell photos uploaded to it

[planegray]

Swing and a miss, pepe. I don't use the service at all. And please, show me where I said they were abusive? Pretty sure I've just been "complaining" regarding their complete about-face in regards to user content.
They're not just tweaking the TOS, they're telling everyone that ever read and agreed to their terms to fuck off.

You mean; "the golden rule" ? :laughing

don't tease raul.

steve: it's a grahm cracker delivery service. like WebVan but more specialized

AWESOME !! Do they use Audi's to deliver ?

 

[n10sive]

In Kindergarten I was taught "Possession is 9/10th's of the law" :laughing

 

[auntiebling]

no, smart cars. audis are to bourgeoisie, this is a proletariat thing

 

[yodaisgod]

If you upload your pic to Instagram and some company wanted to use it, they pay Instagram a fee. Same goes for Facebook.

 

[Toast]

If you set your account to private then they can't sell your pictures.

 

[AbsolutEnduser]

Would you rather Instagram close down? This is the only possible business model for mobile/social. If you don't like that reality, you can always stop using the service, which you never paid a dime for. But to complain about it as abusive, is really just silly and yes, self-entitled.

What do you think of the probability that the world could've been a better place without Instagram?

 

[ohio]

i'll summarize:

ohio/hipster: you stole my photow meanies, i am angrybirds at you. i am going to sue
instazukerberg: ok. we have lots of lawyers
OH:shit. pay me off?
IZ: here's a chrome messnger bag and some skinny lycra culottes for your single speed. go away
OH: sweeeet. where do i sign?

I already have a chrome. Can I get some of those sewn-together cloth shoes instead?

 

[Dr. Evil]

whats the old saying
if your not paying for it your not the customer.

...you're the product.

 

[Marlowe]

If you set your account to private then they can't sell your pictures.

No, another revision in the ToS change explicitly states that it includes content marked private and they aren't responsible for disclosure of 'private' content.

:rofl

 

[ohio]

What path are you going to pick as CEO?

None of the above. I just made $250M for 18 months of work and I'm 27 years old. I'm on a private island with my harem ripping lines of blow and cialis between helicopter rides and mouthfuls of sushi.

 

[auntiebling]

I already have a chrome. Can I get some of those sewn-together cloth shoes instead?

no, look at the TOS. you'll take what we offer and LIKE IT!

 

[aminalmutha]

How about not use it? If you want to share a photo of your dick with your buttbuddies, just text it or email it to 'em.

 

[planegray]

no, look at the TOS. you'll take what we offer and LIKE IT!

is that what they carry the graham crackers in :confused

 

[auntiebling]

grahm crakers fit in a smrt car just fine, they're both small so it's a good fit

 

[Yo!Joe!!!]

Waahahahahahah..! Suckers..!

I don't have an instagram account..! :rofl

 

[mercurial]

Swing and a miss, pepe. I don't use the service at all. And please, show me where I said they were abusive? Pretty sure I've just been "complaining" regarding their complete about-face in regards to user content.
They're not just tweaking the TOS, they're telling everyone that ever read and agreed to their terms to fuck off.

You're really going out on a semantic (and rhetorical) limb here in believing that these are legitimate counterpoints. But that's your right, its the internet after-all :laughing

Anyway, it looks like Instagram is recanting the language and clarifying their business model (hint: it involves shoving advertising into your photo feed.) The pig picture posted above is funny, and very apropos.

 

[mercurial]

None of the above. I just made $250M for 18 months of work and I'm 27 years old. I'm on a private island with my harem ripping lines of blow and cialis between helicopter rides and mouthfuls of sushi.

yea well, I was talking about the CEO that now has to manage this shit pile of a business, Zuckerberg. But yea, it's a pretty sweet thing when your small non-business threatens a large, barely-viable business. :teeth

 

[n10sive]

None of the above. I just made $250M for 18 months of work and I'm 27 years old. I'm on a private island with my harem ripping lines of blow and cialis between helicopter rides and mouthfuls of sushi.

Does this mean we'll never see that bike? or did I miss the outcome of this? :confused

 

[mean dad]

You're really going out on a semantic (and rhetorical) limb here in believing that these are legitimate counterpoints. But that's your right, its the internet after-all :laughing

Anyway, it looks like Instagram is recanting the language and clarifying their business model (hint: it involves shoving advertising into your photo feed.) The pig picture posted above is funny, and very apropos.

:dunno
you lost me. where am I going out on a limb? the part where I said the complaint was regarding the bait-and-switch?

 

[ohio]

Does this mean we'll never see that bike? or did I miss the outcome of this? :confused

Ha, I wish. The question was, if you were the CEO of Instagram...

If you're the CEO of BRD, you're 33 and 3.5 years in you're living off of ramen, tap water, and the goodwill of friends but yes, still bringing the bikes to market (12 months late, but better than even we imagined it would be).