Georgia: The nation's test case

Archimedes

Fire Watcher

Yes, it must be very difficult to read actual numbers... Easier just to complain about an inaccurate bar chart. The actual numbers show that there has been no spike in new cases or deaths, no exponential growth, nothing. And they've been open more than three weeks now.

But don't worry, there will be plenty of anecdotal one-off events for the media to latch onto to make everything seem way worse than it is, just like they have for the past two months. The reality will still be the same; largely empty ICU beds, plenty of idle ventilators, no long lines for testing and the largest share of deaths occurring in nursing homes.
 

mikev

»»───knee───►
:laughing they literally rearranged the dates to make it look like numbers were declining.

You're too much.
 

rodr

Well-known member
Yes, it must be very difficult to read actual numbers... Easier just to complain about an inaccurate bar chart. The actual numbers show that there has been no spike in new cases or deaths, no exponential growth, nothing. And they've been open more than three weeks now. [...]

To the degree that steps are not taken to mitigate infections there will be exponential growth. If they are not and there is not, somebody is lying.
 

bojangle

FN # 40
Staff member

For Wolfson there are at least two explanations behind restricting data. One is if the data are "too flawed" to be useful. The other "is that the data reveal information that could be disturbing or contrary to stated narratives."

With any restricted data, I'm going to just assume it is for corrupt purposes. Because if it were for flawed data, they could just release it and note the nature of why it is believed to be flawed. We should not accept censorship of this type of public health data.
 
Last edited:

budman

General Menace
Staff member
That sucks... :(

I would agree bojangle... this seems to be a hide in place vs a shelter in place.
 

Blankpage

alien
No surprise given the rampant corruption from current political leaders.
If the numbers negativity impact their agenda then change the numbers. They've come to realize that maybe they can get away with it for just long enough.
 

GAJ

Well-known member
No surprise given the rampant corruption from current political leaders.
If the numbers negativity impact their agenda then change the numbers. They've come to realize that maybe they can get away with it for just long enough.

Well, if emergency rooms start getting over taxed that will show itself easily enough.
 

Archimedes

Fire Watcher
To the degree that steps are not taken to mitigate infections there will be exponential growth. If they are not and there is not, somebody is lying.

First, on what factual basis do you make that statement (linking to a HuffPo article quoting a University of Southern Utah, Ogden Annex Epidemiologist who once worked on monkey viruses while in Grad School in Guadalajara notwithstanding)?

Second, who says that steps are not being taken to mitigate infections? Who says the majority of people aren't socially distancing and taking precautions (again, the Atlantic's cherry picked picture of a bunch of rednecks in a bar somewhere notwithstanding)?
 

Blankpage

alien
Well, if emergency rooms start getting over taxed that will show itself easily enough.

I'm waiting to see how they'll respond to that. Probably turn people away for not having healthcare then show images of empty hospital beds saying "see no coronavirus problem here"
 

Archimedes

Fire Watcher
Well, if emergency rooms start getting over taxed that will show itself easily enough.

But they didn't get over taxed during the first wave, so why do you expect they will now other than pure speculation?

The case numbers and death count is going to go up for sure. Anyone who thinks they'll be lower than if we all sat at home is delusional. The question is simply how much worse will it be and will it be manageable. It's up to each person to do their part to mitigate the spread to the best of their ability, but sitting at home indefinitely is not the answer.
 

GAJ

Well-known member
but sitting at home indefinitely is not the answer.

Which is why when we had the SIP I violated it by seeing friends once/week 8 feet apart outside.

I think it's good that some states are opening up more than we are to "test" the waters.

Also some sailors who tested positive, quarantined, recovered, and then were tested again tested positive.

Bad testing or end of all hope for a vaccine???

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/...velt-sailors-test-positive-coronavirus-261873
 
Top