byke
Well-known member
I'm sorry but it is a silly question from a legal perspective. Murder is a legal term
Silly means it's basically impossible, but I'd say it's very possible. There's no additional info in this hypothetical, so if you can find anything halfway reasonable to make it true, then it's no longer silly.
So unless you can prove that he knocked her up for malicious intention to kill her, it's not 1st degree murder.
Right, so if someone knew she had a condition which made pregnancy dangerous and was against termination, then it's pretty easy. Certainly wouldn't be the first time someone poked a hole in a rubber.
Impossible since he did impregnate a woman in advance, so it wasn't a spur of the moment thing.
All you have to do is see is see if there any ways to complicate pregnancy after you've gotten someone pregnant. Really, it's impossible to complicate a pregnancy? What if you put meth in her food?
Also not applicable
Sure it could be, maybe the pregnancy was fine and in an argument he drove them into a tree and that started a medical chain of events that lead to her death.
So which type of murder are you suggesting it might fall under?
Any of them.
I think charging a woman with murder for the miscarriage of her child unless she stabs the baby through her stomach or something is obviously ridiculous.
Well if you're talking about the other thread, this was a full term baby. The only difference is the physical location. If it's okay to kill things you can't see, I think we just found a mass murder's loophole!
Last edited: