I was excited for this bike, but now I don't really see the point. For me, the KLR's weak point was the suspension and the weight. So far I haven't seen anything about a fork upgrade on the new bike, and its far heavier than their older models (100lbs heavier than my already heavy DR). I know the EFI was most likely done to deal with emissions regulations, but im not sure I see it as an upgrade on a go anywhere ride hard, put it away wet kind of bike. Do we need ABS on an offroad bike? I really wanted to see a KLR with better suspension, 6 speed trans, and some of the issues like the doohickey fixed. I get that its cheap, but here is my thinking. If the brand new loaded model is gonna be close to 10k why would I buy this over say, a slightly used 701, 695, or in a couple years a slightly used tenere or 795. Sure, you get a 12 month warranty, but im not sure thats worth a whole lot on a bike like a KLR. Maybe what im seeing is that with all the new bikes out, the KLR just fits a much smaller niche than it did before. I guess if I wanted a light adventure bike, I would be looking at the Yamaha or KTM, and if I wanted a more DS focused bike the 701 or 695 would be a better fit. The KLR seems to fit more of a "cheap ADV bike" category. I hope it does well, its always great to have more people out riding both on and off road, but I think its a bit of a let down to me.