We use the AIM solo quite a bit at out Rick schools. Works great. The trick is....what data are you comparing it to....?
Ken
Translation for those who don't understand: WHO are you comparing your data to? Whose correct line/ data are you comparing to your (incorrect) line/ data? That's an important part of data.
Myself... Lap to lap, corner to corner, where I throttle, where I brake, how far off my lines I am and how much it changes my time good or bad, My corner entry speed and my relative corner exit speed.
For starters anyway...
No bueno because you're not knowledgable on what the baseline for those things are, except yourself...and you're most likely (99.9%) not doing much of that at the correct level.
I don't brake to the apex either. I'll begin turning in a little later than Ken did in his video and will trail off the brakes pretty quickly, as I turn the bike fairly quickly there. I treat it as a double apex, getting to the throttle before the first apex and allowing the line to bulge out a little bit mid corner. Approaching mid corner, I'll stop rolling on or even roll off slightly, and tighten the line to re-point to the second apex. Once re-pointed, I'll resume rolling on prior to the second apex.
Sounds like the car line, with the quick turn into T2. If you hit the washboard bumps on the exit of T2, it's gonna be a slower entry into T3, I've found.
"brake all the way to the apex" is a generalization. its fastest for most corners, but not all of them. so if u ever think "theres no way I can brake THAT far", u might be right. plus, it depends a lot on your definition of 'apex' :laughing
Apex. Interesting term and one that's as ill defined as "counter steering". To short run this post; there may be a different apex for different riders depending on their style and goal (passing, etc) in that turn. That being said, most track riders make up their apex as they approach the corner based on where they area on track at the time and the track they ride is much different each lap...and thus, the apex is different. But, it's THEIR apex, albeit, not an optimal one.
Given that, I like the definition for apex as "point of biggest direction change" or "point of greatest steering". I think this is the first thing I gleaned from Ken 10 years ago....
You can do whatever you want, but I will make 2 comments:
1) At the sharp end of the sport, there are certain fundamentals that are being used that is the consensus of all the top riders.
2) Amateur internet training will net you amateur results.
Ken
Well said.
Forgive me if this multiquote thing dont work as ive never used it before
There are two controls on a motorcycle: Throttle and brake. I was a new expert when I read a comment from a former multi #1 plate. The summation? If you're not using the brake or the throttle, you're not in control...ergo, you're out of control.
Take it for what you will (it's the internet after all), but learning how to approach a corner on the track without brakes has 0 application that I can find, especially if you are running a 2:15 pace. Ken won't give you much more than he's given here as it's his profession, but a day with him would pay big benefits, well (WELL) over the cost of Data Aq. I ran that shit for a season and learned one thing: my teammate and I (at the time) ride totally different and thus, his data was useless to me. My data was pretty useless too cause I wasn't good enough to repeat things lap after lap after lap.
Spend that money on known instructors. If you ask "what does KNOWN mean", it means, names everyone knows and agrees upon. There's about 5 I can think of on the West Coast. Everyone else is wasting your money...and figure you'll get 2 days with them for the cost of that Data Aq that's gonna be a heap of parts when the front end collapses into the tarmac entering Thill T3...
You've got a great resource and professional coach in this thread. Seize it, IMO.