FatCampChamp
Well-known member
Hello all, I could use some help convincing
I need to show that there are plenty of people that would prefer this park to cricket or ball fields and ultimately a larger park over industrial development.
I'm curious why you mention industrial development. If that was an option, why wasn't residential development an option? It's selfish to put e-bike/cricket/ball ahead of the housing crisis. An e-bike park in morgan hill or whatever isn't going to inconvenience us much. It just seems like a huge societal cost to dedicate the land to this small slice of society. If the politics are e-bikes vs cricket, then yea I'm all in, but I'd like more clarification.