Governor Brown Signs AB51 -- we are legal yo~!

KazMan

2012 Fifty is Nifty Tour!
Staff member

only thing I would point out, is that when rider filtered to the front, it was on a solid white line and it looked like he may have crossed that. Had he had to gone to court, he may not have received a wreckless, but he could have gotten something for that act.

I have been pulled over for that many many years ago, and I see CHP pulling over riders who are over the line. I know it may piss off other riders because i won't go, but I also am not getting a stupid ticket just to save 1 minute in my commute if even that.
 

Busy Little Shop

Man behaving bikely...
Uhm...that's what AB51 was all about. :afm199

AB51 is about the definition of lane splitting... there is no mention that lane
splitting is permitted as defined but just as importantly there is no mention
that lane splitting is prohibited as defined...

What we gained...

1) AB51 defines lane splitting in CVC...

2) CHP set lane splitting guidelines...

3) Lane splitting is not prohibited in the CVC...

We can lane split as usual because its not prohibited in the CVC code even
thought its not permitted...
 
Last edited:

budman

General Menace
Staff member
The guideline do not make the law. Lane splitting is legal.

Unsafe lane change, reckless are the only things that limit it.
I split to the speed limit for my own safety and will continue to do that as en experienced rider.

I will have my own tips in print shortly. Pick one up as soon as sept. 17th at the cycle gear in Sac.
 

Smash Allen

Banned
We are better off now that lane splitting is defined in the CVC but we
still don't have any official CVC language permitting lane splitting...

facepalm.jpg


Did you read this thread? All of it? I don't think so.
 

tzrider

Write Only User
Staff member
We are better off now that lane splitting is defined in the CVC but we
still don't have any official CVC language permitting lane splitting...

Larry, why would the CHP have the authority to develop guidelines for a practice that is not legal?

As far as I know, there is no law that says I can do push-ups, but it is legal for me to do them.
 

DataDan

Mama says he's bona fide
What we have here in the United States of America is the rule of law. We inherited this idea from the British, who first recognized it 800 years ago in the Magna Carta. The state can't just make it up as they go along, using muscle to enforce their whims. They are limited in what they can do by the law.

The practical effect of this lofty idea in traffic enforcement is that the LEO must identify a section of the vehicle code that was violated when writing a ticket. Because there is no section prohibiting lane splitting, they can't write a ticket for lane splitting. And even if there were a statute permitting it, they could still write tickets for speeding, reckless, etc., as they do now.
 

Tharkûn

Freeway Moderator
Just because there wasn't a law before doenst mean you couldn't have been cited for riding like a fool. You could get 21658 and 22350 all day long
 

Tharkûn

Freeway Moderator
Yet some people seem to think it was all fair play in the past and now the world is about to end but that is not the case
 

Busy Little Shop

Man behaving bikely...
Larry, why would the CHP have the authority to develop guidelines for a practice that is not legal?.

Good point Andy... it is written by the legislature authorizing guidelines but it is
not written whether lane splitting is permitted or prohibitive in the CVC...

We may continue the practice of lane split because it is not illegal... we can't
say lane slitting is illegal... so in that regard it is the same as it ever was...

If we get stopped by the CHP for illegal lane splitting the Officer will not find
any written infraction in the CVC... we are cited for unsafe lane changes or
reckless riding for conditions but not for lane splitting...

In the future we might get away with a warning if we point out that lane
splitting is OK because it is now defined in the CVC and Budman said it was legal...
 

Busy Little Shop

Man behaving bikely...
The premise I'm coming from is that if something is not prohibited, it is allowed.

I agree that if something is not prohibited it is allowed... that's been the
premise that has allowed us to practice lane splitting... we split because it is
not prohibited in the CVC... however before we can deem lane splitting
legal that action requires the legislature to change the CVC to read lane
splitting is permitted as defined...
 
Last edited:
Top