2019 Dodge story- DEF in fuel

blrmaker

Well-known member
I purchased my 2019 GMC 3500 to haul my toy hauler. The DEF filler is still under the hood which I thought was a PITB but now I am thankful after reading the OP's problems. :wow
 

DefyInertia

Original Saratogian
DEF filer is under the hood in my MB sprinter van (2017). Pain in the ass but whatever. I have a RENNTECH tune that I love...it retains all the stock emissions equipment.
 

Kornholio

:wave
lol swapping the SCR system in and out every other year is not exactly "easy"

Not to mention finding and swapping a tune that codes out the system diags caused by the missing components, because those codes will put you in limp mode with a top speed of ~5 mph.

This happened to a friend going to Tahoe, he had to abandon his trailer on 80 going up the hill. Plenty of other stories on the internet about diesel emission system failures causing people to be stranded.

:shhh

Let the "bros" keep thinking they're smarter than the engineers that designed the system. Although, if they just left the shit alone and actually let it do its intended job, they'd be just fine. It'd be even better if they actually educated themselves on why its necessary in the first place. But I digress...
 

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User
Sure, if it were an LB7. It’s not. :laughing

273,000 miles, still on the originals and balance is well within specs. :thumbup

Ah, is that the first year they changed from the lb7? I had an 02, when i got rid of it with 265k on it i was on my 4th set. Loved that truck except for that. The pump rub transfer case deal was annoying too.
 
:shhh

Let the "bros" keep thinking they're smarter than the engineers that designed the system. Although, if they just left the shit alone and actually let it do its intended job, they'd be just fine. It'd be even better if they actually educated themselves on why its necessary in the first place. But I digress...

I think there are good and bad years of OEM emissions systems. The early Fords with the advanced pollution controls were awful and got abysmal fuel economy. I know that the factory engineers are absolutely competent, but sometimes the accountants hamstring the best ideas.
Modern diesels are incredible, but I think they could be better still.
As far as the bros, it's unfortunate that some people will be that way. While I have a "hopped up" pre smog diesel, none of my tunes roll coal. I'm a firm believer in efficiency above maximum power.
 

brichter

Spun out freakshow
Ah, is that the first year they changed from the lb7? I had an 02, when i got rid of it with 265k on it i was on my 4th set. Loved that truck except for that. The pump rub transfer case deal was annoying too.

Nope, the LB7 was 01-04 and it was the first one, with problematic injectors. Then there was the LLY for 04.5-05, they still had problematic injectors, but you didn’t have to remove the valve covers to change the injectors so it cost less money to replace them when they went bad. :laughing

Then came the LBZ in the 06 and 07 Classic trucks with no injector issues, the six speed Allison, and no DEF/DPF. I spent over 2 years looking for mine, and had to go east of Sacramento to buy it because everybody in the greater Bay Area buys the four-door crew cab with that silly little 5 foot bed. :rolleyes
 

Abacinator

Unholy Blasphemies
My friend bought the same truck a month ago. Spent 20 grand for a truck with 170k and shit paint. Guess it's worth it for the LBZ :dunno
 

Kornholio

:wave
I think there are good and bad years of OEM emissions systems. The early Fords with the advanced pollution controls were awful and got abysmal fuel economy. I know that the factory engineers are absolutely competent, but sometimes the accountants hamstring the best ideas.
Modern diesels are incredible, but I think they could be better still.
As far as the bros, it's unfortunate that some people will be that way. While I have a "hopped up" pre smog diesel, none of my tunes roll coal. I'm a firm believer in efficiency above maximum power.

:thumbup

It has been a learning process for every manufacturer who's basically had the last 10-15 years to get it right. Decades from now, it'll be a no-brainer engineering process, I'm sure.

Deutz used to make some of the most reliable and best performing four-stroke air-cooled diesel engines, but then they had to start complying with Euro standards and especially T4F here in the states which meant water-cooling and SCR and DPF systems. To this day, they still cannot engineer and build a reliable SCR system that just works like all of their competitors have been doing for years. The engines constantly find themselves in limp mode and always when the equipment is needed to work the most reliably. I'm not sure what their problems are with the issue and quite frankly always expected more out of literally the oldest engine manufacturer in the world that's still in business today. You'd think they'd certainly have the money available to bring in the best talent in that regard anyway. :dunno

Also, believe you me, I'm not against a good tune. But yeah, rolling coal doesn't even provide maximum power. All you're doing is over fueling for the sake of a visual effect.
 

Butch

poseur
Staff member
I have never heard of DEF.
So, the geek in me...

DEF is a 32.5% solution of urea, (NH
2)
2CO. When it is injected into the hot exhaust gas stream, the water evaporates and the urea thermally decomposes[6] to form ammonia (NH
3) and isocyanic acid (HNCO):

(NH
2)
2CO → NH
3 + HNCO
The isocyanic acid reacts with the water vapor and hydrolyses to carbon dioxide and ammonia:

HNCO + H
2O → CO
2 + NH
3
Overall, thus far:

(NH
2)
2CO + H
2O → 2 NH
3 + CO
2
Ammonia, in the presence of oxygen and a catalyst, reduces two different nitrogen oxides:[7]

4 NO + 4 NH
3 + O
2 → 4 N
2 + 6 H
2O and
6 NO
2 + 8 NH
3 → 7 N
2 + 12 H
2O
The overall reduction of NO
x by urea is then:

2 (NH
2)
2CO + 4 NO + O
2 → 4 N
2 + 4 H
2O + 2 CO
2 and
4 (NH
2)
2CO + 6 NO
2 → 7 N
2 + 8 H
2O + 4 CO
2

Edit... that did not copy well. But still, pee?
 
Last edited:

cheez

Master Of The Darkside
Just got my little green cap, popped right into the Diesel fill neck under the filler door.

Yeah. Pig piss, and you can smell it in the exhaust. I couldn't figure out the smell the first few times I drove my new 6.7 Cummins but upon seeing it Fish goes "you put any pig piss in it yet?" and the light bulb over my head probably set off the seismometers from the force of the explosion with the intensity of the realization that was, indeed, the smell I'd been smelling around my new truck that I loved so much.

Meh. I wanna do right by mother nature but I need the torks for the draggin things for long distances and the e-solutions just aren't gonna get there in the next decade. But yeah, pig piss, and YUCK.

+1 with the "where's my hybrid Cummins with e-boost launch assist and charge recovery engine braking goodness (for under $100k)?"
 
Last edited:

buellistic

Well-known member
Just got my little green cap, popped right into the Diesel fill neck under the filler door.

Yeah. Pig piss, and you can smell it in the exhaust. I couldn't figure out the smell the first few times I drove my new 6.7 Cummins but upon seeing it Fish goes "you put any pig piss in it yet?" and the light bulb over my head probably set off the seismometers from the force of the explosion with the intensity of the realization that was, indeed, the smell I'd been smelling around my new truck that I loved so much.

Meh. I wanna do right by mother nature but I need the torks for the draggin things for long distances and the e-solutions just aren't gonna get there in the next decade. But yeah, pig piss, and YUCK.

+1 with the "where's my hybrid Cummins with e-boost launch assist and charge recovery engine braking goodness (for under $100k)?"

So basically your saying we have to buy Pig piss..to burn with our Dinosaur fuel.
To be smog complaint..?
 

Kornholio

:wave
I have never heard of DEF.
So, the geek in me...

DEF is a 32.5% solution of urea, (NH
2)
2CO. When it is injected into the hot exhaust gas stream, the water evaporates and the urea thermally decomposes[6] to form ammonia (NH
3) and isocyanic acid (HNCO):

(NH
2)
2CO → NH
3 + HNCO
The isocyanic acid reacts with the water vapor and hydrolyses to carbon dioxide and ammonia:

HNCO + H
2O → CO
2 + NH
3
Overall, thus far:

(NH
2)
2CO + H
2O → 2 NH
3 + CO
2
Ammonia, in the presence of oxygen and a catalyst, reduces two different nitrogen oxides:[7]

4 NO + 4 NH
3 + O
2 → 4 N
2 + 6 H
2O and
6 NO
2 + 8 NH
3 → 7 N
2 + 12 H
2O
The overall reduction of NO
x by urea is then:

2 (NH
2)
2CO + 4 NO + O
2 → 4 N
2 + 4 H
2O + 2 CO
2 and
4 (NH
2)
2CO + 6 NO
2 → 7 N
2 + 8 H
2O + 4 CO
2

Edit... that did not copy well. But still, pee?

In short, in my shop, it's usually known as cat's piss. It definitely smells similar. :laughing
 

blrmaker

Well-known member
"Main raw materials for the production of UREA are Ammonia and Carbon Dioxide for which the feedstocks are Naphtha and fuel oil."


And all this time i thought urea was from the glue factory. :nchantr
 
Last edited:

kpke

Veteran
Exactly!

My 6.4L Powestroke started getting REALLY bad blow by (worse than usual), which one these trucks usually means a cracked piston. I took it to Car Max and they gave me $16k for it and I would have taken waaaay less. They didn’t even lift the oil fill cap to check for blow by. :laughing

I took that $16k and started looking for a 5.9L Cummins. I looked for a 2006/2007 Ram 3500 dually quad cab 4x4 for over a month before I found mine. It was the only one I found west of the Rockies with under 150k miles and under $30k asking price. It had 114k miles and came with 5th wheel rails, air bags, brake controller, and a BD Diesel exhaust brake too. Everything I needed for my toy hauler. I’m not crazy about the color (maroon), but it wasn’t a deal breaker.

I paid $27k and felt like I got a hell of a deal.

Those DEF stories are horrible.

I'm beginning to think I made an "investment" on this truck (until something breaks). I have about 20K in to it after a diesel checkup, rear brakes (I replaced), tires ($$$$), and some other fixes, with less than 80K on the clock. Wasn't crazy about the color either. It's "pretty" but I would prefer white. Beggars can't be choosers though.

Does a truck like this qualify for the "brodozer club"? I really want to join. :rolleyes It's not lifted, not 4wd, and mostly stock.

4zT5jZ2h.jpg
 

Climber

Well-known member
:thumbup

It has been a learning process for every manufacturer who's basically had the last 10-15 years to get it right. Decades from now, it'll be a no-brainer engineering process, I'm sure.

Deutz used to make some of the most reliable and best performing four-stroke air-cooled diesel engines, but then they had to start complying with Euro standards and especially T4F here in the states which meant water-cooling and SCR and DPF systems. To this day, they still cannot engineer and build a reliable SCR system that just works like all of their competitors have been doing for years. The engines constantly find themselves in limp mode and always when the equipment is needed to work the most reliably. I'm not sure what their problems are with the issue and quite frankly always expected more out of literally the oldest engine manufacturer in the world that's still in business today. You'd think they'd certainly have the money available to bring in the best talent in that regard anyway. :dunno

Also, believe you me, I'm not against a good tune. But yeah, rolling coal doesn't even provide maximum power. All you're doing is over fueling for the sake of a visual effect.
The problem probably is that the old geezers in the company still have enough power that they won't let the young guns have full say in the development. My brother and I have run into that kind of crap in the engineering world, the dinosaurs in the company don't want to admit that the world has passed them by yet still retain enough build-up of service to have more power/weight than they should.
 
Top