well traditionally I would assume it was heritage. Now days...... ease of access?
Or is it sexist to assume that it is a "kilt" and not a skirt? But would a kilt still be a kilt if a female wore it? Or would a skirt still be a skirt if a male wore it?
I think you are being 1/2 cocked with your labeling. I wish the media would get this right!!!
You're completely right though. It is so difficult now days to discuss genders, assumed genders, X, etc and not be offensive and confusing!
yes. A kilt is akilt and in no additional way is it a skirt cause of the wearerer.
Can't we all clearly see the difference between a Welsh National vs a Modern Robbinson? Its like some people wouldn't know a Dress Gordon if it slapped them in the face!!
yes. A kilt is akilt and in no additional way is it a skirt cause of the wearerer.
well traditionally I would assume it was heritage. Now days...... ease of access?
Or is it sexist to assume that it is a "kilt" and not a skirt? But would a kilt still be a kilt if a female wore it? Or would a skirt still be a skirt if a male wore it?
Unless it's a Utilikilt
https://www.utilikilts.com/
Don't know why anyone would want to work wearing one. Shorts work for me.