Gary J
Well-known member
I'm not sure that I agree with this one if you're riding a powerful bike like my KTM 990. It's too easy to slide the rear tire at higher engine speeds both from giving it a little too much throttle or from engine braking if you let off too much. I don't have the same issue with my XR650L.
I understand Scott, and agree regarding different engine displacements and engine/bike types, having a unique "sweet spot" for the optimum RPM to have the engine working while going through corners in the wet.
Certainly on a torquey, powerful 990cc twin-cylinder machine like the KTM, my generic reference to being in a "lower" gear, to work the optimum RPM range, needs to looked at as it pans out into actual numbers for that bike.
The key is to have the bike in whatever gear will allow the motor to be working in an RPM that allows for the most even and linear degree of power application/control to the rear wheel (for "smoothness"!) by the rider.
You definitely do not want that gear selection, and resultant RPM, to be at a range where the power delivery on a particular bike's engine is abrupt or hard to smoothly modulate.
Just as a ballpark example of my vision of likely optimum working RPM ranges would be:
(NOTE: This is in reference more to riding corners on the backroads where you, the bike and the turns are the bulk of the focus. Though keeping the bike working in a way that minimizes the chances of overloading the front tire's grip in the wet is equally important, it should be noted that riding done when navigating around town and general city streets, requires a high focus and consideration on all the other factors around you!
- 990cc twin with 100+ HP and 60+ Ft/Lb of torque: ................ 4K-5K (?)
- 600cc inline-four: ......................... 6K-8K (?)
- 250cc inline-four - (Ninja 250): ................. 7K-9K (?)
These are just ballpark examples, for consideration and discussion.
One of the other reasons (besides the linear power control) for consciously avoiding riding with the engine way down in the low near-lug-it range, is that the increased rotational speed of the faster spinning mass of the bike's engine parts (crank, flywheel, etc) provides an increased amount of gyroscopic effect. This force helps to keep the bike wanting to stay upright on two wheels, in working against the forces that are wanting the tires to slide out from under it on the wet pavement.
The more forces that are working to propel the bike in the direction its tires are pointing (and the rider wants it to go), and the more force (gyro) at work trying to keep the bike from rotating on it's center (tires sliding out), the less the chances of the bike going down.
As with anything, if you personally find that something different works best for you, on your type/size bike, for your kind of riding in the wet, by all means stick with it! :thumbup
However I do have extreme confidence that the techniques I'm sharing on wet weather riding do have validity, and do work (if done properly). Learning by real world experimentation and testing of going in every possible direction (including the wrong way ....... OUCH!) on these things, and then letting the dust settle to what proved from the final outcome to work.
100K+ miles of extreme wet weather riding, while staying mostly upright, at some pretty "spirited for conditions" paces at times, during some of the worst possible weather conditions both on and off the track, on a wide range of different bike and tires, have provided that validation. :ride
Last edited: