No license... an invitation to a :rose.

Cafe Racer

King of this hill
RE: Tiered licensing, stats aren't inconclusive, it's just a very small effect.

There seems to be a large misunderstanding...

Tiered licensing stops 16-year olds from jumping on an R1. It doesn't stop the over-50's getting anything they want. At least, not as it's implemented in most places.


Why do you gotta say 50? :twofinger

Miguel
 

JakesKTM

Well-known member
Nothing and nobody prepared me for riding except necessity. I had $600 saved up and bought a friend of a friends bike 30 years ago. No license and no gear. I had a helmet that was too old and too big to be worth a damn and sonic rode without it most the time.

I joined the navy at 17 and took my bike with me to where I was stationed- I was made to do a safety course and that was it. No specialized license required to get my bike on base.

I didn't really get much out of that safety course and I never bothered to get my proper M-1 for the next 25 years over which time I bought rode insured and sold no less than 12 bikes. A license is nothing more than a piece of plastic withe your picture on it. Your ability to ride within your limit is innate and based on ego and intelligence.

Msf courses have come a long way but it wasn't until I went to the track that. My skills became honed.

Plenty of licensed riders and drivers die. I don't agree a license is an invitation to a rose.
 

O.T.

Well-known member
It's a license to drive and not training to ride there is a big difference.
The license covers the rules of the road. Not how to handle the bike.
 

ALANRIDER7

MeowMeowMeow
There are so many things that bug me about some riders (read: the immature dumbshit ones), and this is one of the top ones. There's really no good excuse for operating ANY vehicle without being properly licensed.

Dave

Being licensed and being properly trained are two very different things. Riding around cones in a parking lot has ZERO to do with surviving on the roads out there.


youtu.be/ZBgrVI0Dyto
 

budman

General Menace
Staff member
Nothing and nobody prepared me for riding except necessity. I had $600 saved up and bought a friend of a friends bike 30 years ago. No license and no gear. I had a helmet that was too old and too big to be worth a damn and sonic rode without it most the time.

I joined the navy at 17 and took my bike with me to where I was stationed- I was made to do a safety course and that was it. No specialized license required to get my bike on base.

I didn't really get much out of that safety course and I never bothered to get my proper M-1 for the next 25 years over which time I bought rode insured and sold no less than 12 bikes. A license is nothing more than a piece of plastic withe your picture on it. Your ability to ride within your limit is innate and based on ego and intelligence.

Msf courses have come a long way but it wasn't until I went to the track that. My skills became honed.

Plenty of licensed riders and drivers die. I don't agree a license is an invitation to a rose.

My inference was statistically based.

So look at the numbers and you will see a big difference.
Part of that is being responsible and making good decisions.

I would say a license is a little bit more than a piece of plastic.
Try handing a piece of plastic to an officer without that picture and seal from the State saying your allowed on the roadways.

I totally agree it has little to do with training or honing skills. However you cannot ignore the stats. Your a good one.. you did it. Cool.
 

Norbs

Well-known member
My inference was statistically based.

So look at the numbers and you will see a big difference.
Part of that is being responsible and making good decisions.

I would say a license is a little bit more than a piece of plastic.
Try handing a piece of plastic to an officer without that picture and seal from the State saying your allowed on the roadways.

I totally agree it has little to do with training or honing skills. However you cannot ignore the stats. Your a good one.. you did it. Cool.

Remember back when correlation and causation were the same thing?... oh yeah, me neither...
 

Underdog

Prehistoric
My inference was statistically based.

So look at the numbers and you will see a big difference.
Part of that is being responsible and making good decisions.

I would say a license is a little bit more than a piece of plastic.
Try handing a piece of plastic to an officer without that picture and seal from the State saying your allowed on the roadways.

I totally agree it has little to do with training or honing skills. However you cannot ignore the stats. Your a good one.. you did it. Cool.

License & Registration is the state's way of coaxing some money from you, on a yearly basis =)

That said, I bet there is some relationship between ones moral code and rule abiding to how they control their motorcycle :)
 

Joebar4000

Well-known member
Why do you gotta say 50? :twofinger

Miguel

Cos I'm getting close myself? Shit!

Ackshully, I think the final tier in the UK at least, is 24.

Ah, found it:

"
The AM category is a moped-only licence, which you can hold from the age of 16.

An A1 licence is open to 17-year-olds upwards and restricts riders to 125cc, without L-plates.

The A2 licence restricts you to motorcycles of up to 35kW (47bhp), and you must take your test on a bike of more than 20kW (27bhp). This is open to 19-year-olds and older.

The A licence is a full motorcycle licence, available only for those aged 24 and over."
 

packnrat

Well-known member
this arugment has been used and abused to death.
both sides of the fence use it to prove there way of thinking.

and this is in more than just sport bikes ver ?

any machine / tool / gaget / etc. in the hands of a HUMAN can be used for good or bad. it is NOT the item or parts bolted to it. it is up to the only part (not part of said item) involved that has a brain sitting between two ears.
everything else is just fluff.

i do not know how to drive a tank (can learn), if i were to try..lets just say i will try and stay out of the bmw auto sales lot ;-)

any item can be used for good with the correct training.


AND willingness on the part of the opperator.

.
 

Afterburner

double finger, throttle!!
yes! i think we should have tiered license for ALL drivers 16-21 yo. 4 cyl. 21-36 yo. 6 cyl.(only) and 37-65 yo. V8's (optional) and 65 yo.+ for V12 twin turbo (mandatory!!)

i think we got this solved.. it's gunna be a safer world!!!!

"hey, grandma!! :afm199 how about a ride... sexy!!" ;)
 
Last edited:

Afterburner

double finger, throttle!!
even any 6 year old knows that a 33 yo. just cant handle the power of a V8 without proper training from the US govt. without certified proper valid credentials plus monthly continuing education and enclosed track/safety lab time. it's just common sense! it's just too much power. everyone knows you need 49 years of experience with 4 cyl./6 cyl. and 8 cyls. before you should even touch a V12 turbo..
 

iudi2006

Active member
I got my first street bike when I was 18. Refuse to get a license until i'm 21. Ive ridden motorcycles competitively since the age of 5 and was not going to pay over $200 and 20 hours of my life in a classroom learning principles i had known for most of my life. Soon as i turn 21 i'll go to the DMV and get my license no problem. I could see how some might say that "younger riders are more dangerous and therefor are required to take safety courses". But if i am able to go overseas to serve the military and potentially end my life, I have to be 21 in order to go and get my M1? Not in my book.
 
Last edited:

latindane

Learner. EuroPW, NaPS
[...]"younger riders are more dangerous and therefor are required to take safety courses". But if i am able to go overseas to serve the military and potentially end my life, I have to be 21 in order to go and get my M1? Not in my book.

Being more dangerous is PRECISELY WHY they're more than happy to ship you overseas to have you fight for their interests while they stay at home. But this is not the politics thread, so I won't say more, just pointing out that there is another way to look at what you argue.

PS: I'm not American by birth, citizenship, or residence, but I am 100% sure that you went to fight with a higher purpose than what I think those who sent you had (depending on where to), and I sure as hell can respect your decision to do it and you as a person for doing it. So please don't take the above as a "jab".
 
Last edited:

brownwa

rides bikes and likes it
...
any item can be used for good with the correct training.

AND willingness on the part of the opperator.

This. The "willingness" to learn is the problem. Buying a motorcycle should be like buying a firearm: do the course, get the license, buy the gun. A 27 y.o. dumbass will kill himself on a 125cc dirtbike if he's overtaking on a blind corner. Same thing with dumping a wheelie at 50mph and colliding with a car/post/cat.

IMHO, make the MSF course mandatory but make it cheaper. For those who've ridden since birth, look at it this way: you will have chicks/hunks all over you at the MSF course after your first foot-down-rear-wheel-slide around the figure 8 cone. I distinctly remember some hot girls in my MSF class.
 

packnrat

Well-known member
This is the only Western country that allows undocumented riders to purchase a bike from a dealer. Pretty much everywhere else, the dealer is required to verify that the buyer has the appropriate license and proof of insurance before he can transfer title.

AFAIK, automobile dealers in the US have this obligation - so why not Moto dealers? :x


not at the mexican car dealers in the central valley,
they have signs in large letters stateing no dl or insurance required to buy from them. you pay 100% down.
they do not care who is buying the car/pu truck/suv/mini van/etc.:wow

if there is a law saying proof is required, they do not care about it.


.and stuf it about raceissem. these are overnight auto dealers who proudly proclam they are mexican.


.
 
Top