Missouri repeals all-rider helmet law

DataDan

Mama says he's bona fide
Effective August 28, 2020, riders in Missouri, which currently has an all-rider helmet law, will be able to ride helmetless. At least some of them. The requirement will no longer apply to riders age 26+ with health insurance.

Missouri ranks 22nd among states in motorcycle registrations, 31st in registrations per 1000 population. Show-Me state motorcyclists ride an average of 3424 miles per year per registered bike, 8th highest in the US. Over 5 years, 2014-2018, an average of 110 Missouri motorcyclists have been killed per year, 15th highest.

Since 1997, 6 states have repealed all-rider helmet laws as shown in the graph below. Nevertheless, helmet use in US crashes has gradually increased.

attachment.php


After the Michigan repeal, I didn't think we'd see any more; the movement seemed to have lost steam. But here we are. As BARF's dutiful bean counter I have kept track of helmet use, helmet laws, and the effect on motorcycle fatalities.


Helmets save lives

NHTSA estimates the effectiveness of helmets at saving lives based on a 2004 study of data from 1993 to 2002, which concluded that 37% of unhelmeted riders killed would survive wearing a helmet. However, that study is often criticized due to thin data (it depends on 2-up cases where rider is helmeted, passenger not, and vice-versa). My continuation of the same study thru 2018 (with 4 times as many of those infrequent cases) estimates 36% effectiveness.

Estimated differently--as rider lethality (deaths/crashes) for all crashes--an unhelmeted rider is 40% more likely to be killed than a helmeted rider.

attachment.php



Data available from states that have repealed all-rider helmet laws suggests that Missouri can expect crash lethality to increase by 30-40% over the next few years.

attachment.php



Ironically, riders age 26+ who will have the option of riding helmetless, are more vulnerable in a helmetless crash than the < 25s, who will not have the option.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • BARF MO post fig 1.jpg
    BARF MO post fig 1.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 496
  • BARF MO post fig 2.jpg
    BARF MO post fig 2.jpg
    59.3 KB · Views: 494
  • BARF MO post fig 3.jpg
    BARF MO post fig 3.jpg
    60.6 KB · Views: 489

ScottRNelson

Mr. Dual Sport Rider
Yet still can't split lanes, legally, in all but CA
Utah allows it in stopped traffic. They added that law a year or two ago.

Idaho only requires helmets if you're under 18. Surprisingly, it's mostly older guys on big cruisers without helmets. Most other riders wear them. Idaho is much better about riders wearing helmets than neighboring Utah. Don't know why the difference.

A few days ago I stopped in a place for lunch carrying my helmet and gloves. A woman there waiting for takeout asked if it was heavy. I held it up with one finger to show that it really wasn't. She then said that she didn't like helmets. And I explained that I've personally scraped up a couple of helmets, so I always wear one. No change of opinion on either side of that discussion.
 

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User
Utah allows it in stopped traffic. They added that law a year or two ago.

Idaho only requires helmets if you're under 18. Surprisingly, it's mostly older guys on big cruisers without helmets. Most other riders wear them. Idaho is much better about riders wearing helmets than neighboring Utah. Don't know why the difference.

A few days ago I stopped in a place for lunch carrying my helmet and gloves. A woman there waiting for takeout asked if it was heavy. I held it up with one finger to show that it really wasn't. She then said that she didn't like helmets. And I explained that I've personally scraped up a couple of helmets, so I always wear one. No change of opinion on either side of that discussion.

I'm in TX so i see it quite a bit. Used to trip me out, but don't even give it much mind anymore. I'm fine with people wanting to put themselves at risk. If i could split lanes for more than 30 seconds without encountering road rage though, that'd be nice.
 

nebulous

Well-known member
So your health insured and past the age of testosterone submersion?
So You want to take off your helmet once in a while?

Liberty: some people wont like that.
 

D408

Active member
Its wild to me that people won't wear helmets. One of my riding buddies has an issue with this. He's crashed twice without a helmet in the last few months. One bike totalled, broken back, messed up ribs, and now he rides very timidly. Still, he goes out to work on his bike, wants to get the oil up to temp, and runs up and down the block with no helmet. The other day he ran down to the local shop in shorts. You would think at this point he would have learned, but alas he has not. Some people just don't get it.
 

chickenfried

Super Noob
Well two crashes. He's still here and you didn't mention anything about his head being injured. Why would he think he needs to change now?

I'm ATGATT but fine with other people making their own risk assessment.
Its wild to me that people won't wear helmets. One of my riding buddies has an issue with this...
 
Last edited:

sunken

Rider
I always hear the argument/complaint riding without a helmet costs taxpayers money in form of healthcare costs. Is this actually true? Are there any studies on this? Seems doubtful to me.
 

bosco12

Well-known member
I always hear the argument/complaint riding without a helmet costs taxpayers money in form of healthcare costs. Is this actually true? Are there any studies on this? Seems doubtful to me.

Perhaps because studies were done some time ago:

Over the past 30 years, helmet law advocates have gathered a mountain of evidence to support their claims that helmet laws reduce motorcycle accident fatalities and severe injuries. Thanks to the rounds of helmet law repeals, advocates have been able to conclusively prove the converse as well: helmet law repeals increase fatalities and the severity of injuries.

US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health:
Paternalism & Its Discontents: Motorcycle Helmet Laws, Libertarian Values, and Public Health
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1781413/

Novelty helmet use and motorcycle rider fatality
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5924707/

Evaluation of motorcycle helmet law repeal in Arkansas and Texas
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/1046

There's even more to Google up.
 

cjymiller

Well-known member
Separate from the fact that helmets save lives, anything that hits my face 30mph or faster is painful. They got some big bugs down there I'm sure...
 

budman

General Menace
Staff member
I will chime in as I have been a huge lid proponent forever, but also spent some Harley years where not wearing one provided some advantages... assuming you don't crash. As an FYI helmets have likely saved my life a half dozen times or more probably.

A little tongue and cheek so don't jump me :twofinger

Advantages of NOT wearing a helmet.
1. It slows you down.. any thing above 80 is usually avoided. Flappy cheeks, watering eyes and yes.. bug hits get painful.
2. When you get to the bar your hair looks good.
3. Seemed that chicks dug it (this was the early 90's and I was just divorced so chicks digging it was important :laughing)
4. Speaking of chicks you are much more accessible to kissing and such.
5. Easy to flirt with a girl driving a car at a stoplight.
6. Easy for a girl to decide if you have a chance of taking her home.
7. You don't have to worry about it being stolen.

OK.. all I got. :p
 
Top