Merc article :Motorcycle deaths on the rise in Silicon Valley and California

weasel

Eradicator
Motorcycle deaths on the rise in Silicon Valley and California

By Gary Richards

Mercury News
Article Launched: 10/11/2008 07:00:00 PM PDT

When a few hundred motorcyclists gather in La Honda today at a benefit to raise money for paramedics, some will stop to talk to emergency medical workers and Highway Patrol officers who work the mountain roads bikers love to ride.

And what they hear may be sobering.

Motorcycle deaths are on a pace to rival the death rates California had before helmets were made mandatory in 1992. At least 332 bikers and passengers have been killed on state highways through September, and the number is likely to approach last year's total of 474 fatalities.

There haven't been that many deaths since 512 motorcyclists died in the state in 1991, the last year they could ride without a helmet.

Worse yet, the current figures do not include motorcycle deaths on city streets. That information won't be known until sometime next year, and the total is likely to surpass the 1991 level.

"It's alarming," said California Highway Patrol officer Todd Thibodeau, who works out of the department's San Jose office, in an area where eight motorcyclists have died this year compared with one a year ago. "And it's all over."

There are many theories behind the troubling numbers. Younger riders don't get the training to handle souped-up bikes. Older riders over 50 are getting back on motorcycles much more powerful than what they first rode two decades ago. And to combat high gas prices, more people are turning to motorcycles because their gas mileage is
two or three times better than that of cars and trucks.

Also, motorists aren't accustomed to seeing so many motorcyclists on the road, and they don't allow them enough space to navigate today's crowded roadways.

The state held a special meeting in the summer to figure out ways to address the rising carnage, the first ever aimed specifically at motorcyclists. More than 270 safety officials showed up. When the CHP offered a safety session in San Jose, a couple dozen riders were expected. About 75 showed up.

The focus, many think, should be on more, tougher training.

"It is far too easy for anyone to get a car or motorcycle license in this state or country," said Harold Basquin, 52, who has been riding a motorcycle since he was 16. "The training is minimal and the tests are a joke. How does riding a motorcycle around cones in a parking lot prove that you are ready to take on the real world?"

A study by Progressive Insurance last year concluded that motorcycle riders who switch and buy more powerful bikes are nearly 70 percent more likely to crash than riders who keep the same bike, regardless of experience level or bike type. Data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration found that over the past decade there has been a 134 percent increase in engines over 100cc in size.

A check of the eight deaths on Santa Clara County highways this year showed no single pattern. A 23-year-old man died on Interstate 880 near Great Mall Parkway, perhaps going too fast. A 52-year-old was killed on Highway 85 near Blossom Hill Road when changing lanes. Another was killed on Highway 17 near Highway 9 when a car ahead slowed and he collided with another rider, fell to the ground and then was hit by a sport-utility vehicle from behind. A 60-year-old man died on Highway 9 when he took a curve and hit a tree.

Two possibly involved drinking. They occurred at all times of day and night. Some were riding with friends; others were going solo.

Another concern: inattentive drivers yakking on cell phones instead of scanning the road.

"I see drivers holding phones up to talk, texting, reading papers or books, smoking marijuana, shaving, applying makeup, doing many things other than paying attention to driving," said Mark Buckelew, who commutes daily on his motorcycle from South San Jose to Alameda and who for several years was an instructor for the California Motorcycle Safety Program. "When I'm riding, I'm paying strict attention to my surroundings."

A frequent complaint is motorcyclists who cut between lanes. That's legal in California at low speeds, but not legal and not wise at higher speeds.

Yet in the eight deaths in the South Bay this year, none involved splitting lanes, and few crashes occurred because of this practice.

"It's not people splitting lanes on sports bikes at 80 miles per hour, and it's not always inexperience," said the CHP's Thibodeau. "We can't pinpoint it."

if you're interested

Today's motorcycle rally in La Honda will be from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Admission is free, with all proceeds from entry fees, sport bike suspension setup clinic and raffles benefiting the La Honda Fire Brigade.

Contact Gary Richards at grichards@mercurynews.com or (408) 920-5335.

MOTORCYCLE DEATHS

Motorcycle fatalities in California, 2003 to present:
2003: 379
2004: 363
2005: 419
2006: 443
2007: 474
2008: 332*
*Through September

Source: California Highway Patrol
 

cole123

Well-known member
I really blame the auto industry for many of the idot drivers. Instead of making cars crash better make em fooking hurt when you crash. It will make people pay more attention....quick:twofinger
 

Angel-be-Good

250cc, whaddabouddit?
This is pretty intriguing:
A study by Progressive Insurance last year concluded that motorcycle riders who switch and buy more powerful bikes are nearly 70 percent more likely to crash than riders who keep the same bike, regardless of experience level or bike type.
Does that mean if you want a litrebike you should start on one since switching later will make you 70% more likely to crash?

I really blame the auto industry for many of the idot drivers. Instead of making cars crash better make em fooking hurt when you crash. It will make people pay more attention....quick:twofinger
Naw, the auto industry would be more than content to keep selling the 2,000 lb tin can cars of yore with today's engines (it'd sure help the gas mileage complaints). It's the consumer advocacy folks like Ralph Nader that are responsible for the ever-increasing safety of the majority of vehicles. Some of the luxury brands go above and beyond, with such fantastic aids as "lane departure warning" and "blind spot monitoring," which make it easier than ever to drive without paying attention to what you're doing.
 
Last edited:

SuperSixFour

We don't rent pigs.
Also there's a lot more people in the valley since 1991.

And a lot more motorcyclists.

Statistics are always open to interpretation, though I do generally feel that the average skill level of motorcyclists in the Bay Area has been decreasing. Though that's probably just a skewed perspective because I'm getting older!
 

Ant

Pink Freud
And a lot more motorcyclists.

Statistics are always open to interpretation, though I do generally feel that the average skill level of motorcyclists in the Bay Area has been decreasing. Though that's probably just a skewed perspective because I'm getting older!

I agree with what you said and add that the power difference between 1990's bikes vs today's machines are pretty damn high.
 

DataDan

Mama says he's bona fide
I don't have 2007 data because CHP doesn't publish until about 18 months after the end of the period. But I do have their data from '93 to '06, and the news is actually good: The death rate per registered motorcycle has remained about unchanged since 2000, in spite of a more than 50% increase in registrations. That kind of growth in the sport would tend to increase the death rate because of all the n00bs and the resulting decrease in average riding experience in the population. But that hasn't affected California the way it has other states.

The bottom line is that more people are dying on motorcycles because more people are riding them. Observations like that are why I have no future in journalism.
 

Attachments

  • cafatalityrate.JPG
    cafatalityrate.JPG
    78.2 KB · Views: 83

mhpcto

2Strokes4Ever
Also there's a lot more people in the valley since 1991.

Reporting absolute numbers is indeed pointless. It's like saying the market is down 35 points. What matters is the fatality rate - the number of fatalities compared to the number of riders (more accurately, the number of miles ridden).

Before I forget: D A R W I N
 

Ant

Pink Freud
Reporting absolute numbers is indeed pointless. It's like saying the market is down 35 points. What matters is the fatality rate - the number of fatalities compared to the number of riders (more accurately, the number of miles ridden).

Before I forget: D A R W I N

I'm thinking more people = more cars on the road.
 

jrod

Well-known member
I think a european type of motorcycle licensing program may be on the way. Everyone has gotten "bubble wrap" safety mentality. It will suck but it will be better than having bikes limited or banned. The MSF needs more backing to put on more advanced and intermediate classes. Too many people go to the basic rider course and thats it. They think they know everything they need to know.
 

jstabeemer

Well-known member
Also when a kid buys a R6 or something he/she thinks they are a racer or can race. I have been riding for 30+ years now and kids were amazed at what I could do on a KLR650 when they were on thier r6's. It is not the bike, it is the rider. And other times it is the idiot on the cell phone. Riding has not become fun anymore. I have to ride very defensive and not much time to enjoy it. I will still ride but hopfully find a nice place to do it.
 

streetsquid

Well-known member
I don't have 2007 data because CHP doesn't publish until about 18 months after the end of the period. But I do have their data from '93 to '06, and the news is actually good: The death rate per registered motorcycle has remained about unchanged since 2000, in spite of a more than 50% increase in registrations. That kind of growth in the sport would tend to increase the death rate because of all the n00bs and the resulting decrease in average riding experience in the population. But that hasn't affected California the way it has other states.

The bottom line is that more people are dying on motorcycles because more people are riding them. Observations like that are why I have no future in journalism.

This is exactly what I was thinking. Thanks Dan for doing the work I was too lazy to do. I think most of us already figured out that while the number of fatalities may have increased the percentage has remained virtually unchanged. I'm not saying the number of fatalities is acceptable by any means but the number put into perspective makes more sense.

I just want to :ride in peace.
 

vstrom_rider

SF Rider
I personally do not want to see European style Tiered licencing. Really figuring out root cause from a bunch of statistics is not simple. Is it really just a skills problem? Because bikes are faster? There are many riders that have plenty of skill, but poor judgement and ride recklessly. If we did implement Tiered licencing then why not for cars too? By the same reasoning , performance cars should require an 'advanced' licence becaue they are so much faster than a small compact. In fact, since cars are more of a risk to people other than the driver it should be more important to regulate them.. No thanks, we don't need a UK style Nanny state.
 

SuperMike

unsexy
"...over the past decade there has been a 134 percent increase in engines over 100cc in size."

That's gotta be a typo, right?
 

iehawk

Well-known member
I think a european type of motorcycle licensing program may be on the way. Everyone has gotten "bubble wrap" safety mentality. It will suck but it will be better than having bikes limited or banned. The MSF needs more backing to put on more advanced and intermediate classes. Too many people go to the basic rider course and thats it. They think they know everything they need to know.

I hope they'll do it for cars as well. We can be the safest group, motorcycle riders. But if car drivers are still getting dumber and dumber, it's pointless.
 

sixtytwo

meh.
I hope they'll do it for cars as well. We can be the safest group, motorcycle riders. But if car drivers are still getting dumber and dumber, it's pointless.

I'm finding that more and more drivers simply don't understand how much potential damage their own vehicles can cause. Given the list of safety features standard on modern vehicles, many see that as cushioning from their own piss poor driving.

If it was up to me, I would like to see a weight/power limit for new drivers and those who have had a history of problematic driving. Too many drivers don't know the limits of their vehicles' handling and braking, and in the event of a collision, the more weight their vehicle has, the more damage it does.

And yes, I totally agree that regardless of how much training we as riders get, and no matter how safe we are, it's only part of the problem.
 

freshslicks

MotoGP Fanatic
DataDan has invested untold hours in assembling absolutely accurate statistics and could be the 'go to' resource for the multitude of lazy reporters who keep cranking out these half-baked stories. Maybe a sensible approach is to somehow place him, via a BARF section for reporters or other data seekers to access, at the top of the Google search for 'California motorcycle accident statistics' query and everything close to that. There have got to be BARFers with local Google contacts that could forward this on as a service to the public if nothing else.

DD's posts are consistently impressive, especially as he takes great pains to be avoid coloring the data with a slant. What lazy reporter wouldn't love to cut and paste his information? Then, despite their own lack of motivation to uncover the truth in these numbers, it could be spoon fed to them and accurate info could at last be disseminated to the otherwise ignorant public.

If this were an adjunct to BARF, possibly even utilizing BARF resources which could be funded by BARFers via contributions specific to this effort, it would seem this could also promote BARF in the most positive of ways.

And if some effort were to be put into assembling this information into a website with various FAQs (the same ten or twelve questions seem to get asked over and over again), DataDan's efforts could be maximized and simplified tor consumption. And thanks for the info that you have supplied to our relatively small community to date, Dan!

Just a thought...my paying gig is IT Project Mgmt and I'd be happy to volunteer time if there is interest.
 

DataDan

Mama says he's bona fide
And thanks for the info that you have supplied to our relatively small community to date, Dan!
And thank you for the complimentary post. :cool

Even without extra effort to highlight the analyses I've posted, I am glad to steer anyone who is interested toward the sources and methods I've found useful. I think everyone would benefit from a more accurate portrayal of motorcycling than we usually see in the media.


US DOT's 2007 data became available soon after my first post in this thread. I started a new thread last week, Motostats 2007, for discussion of the latest information but haven't posted much yet. I did uncover some intriguing facts about California and the Bay Area. If you missed the thread, you might find that it adds some depth to the Murky News article.
 

Blind_Io

Exiled North of The Wall
The problem is only partially the riders. I see the real problem as the drivers with whom we share the road. I have seen increased aggression or indifference towards riders as the year wears on; drivers either act as if we are not there (even when they do see us) or act aggressively.

Instead of focusing on only half the problem, how about an initiative to target the drivers who put riders at risk? Greater education and training for all road users should be mandatory along with a PSA campaign to raise awareness about riding and the laws that govern road use. I would also like to see more police action to defend riders, not target them. We already are under a microscope when it comes to law enforcement, but drivers literally get away with attempted murder.

When I'm on my bike I feel very alone out there on the road - and that's on a good day. Most of the time I feel like I'm in the cross-hairs, either the target of choice for law enforcement or something for a driver to hit.

All this focus on the riders is fine, and I approve of the training initiative, but that's only half the problem.

I propose a PR campaign, sponsored by BARF. We have enough people to make a real difference if we ever could get organized. Freshslicks has a great idea, and I say we run with it - but instead of waiting for the media to do a Google search, why not start by typing up and releasing our own press releases? Email or fax them in to the local news stations and newspapers, and post them on the front page. Papers already copy-and-paste press releases from major companies, why not us? It's copy space that is already written and we can get the real story out there and raise awareness. If even one news station picks this up as a local story, I'm sure the others would follow simply to offer due coverage.
 
Last edited:
Top