Everyone has seen this type of report
https://www.sfgate.com/business/net...olds-could-afford-a-13141480.php?t=a2e07d569a
My point isn't to argue that housing costs aren't high. Rather I'm suggesting the conventional measures of housing affordability are inaccurate in markets where housing is drastically over or under priced. Statements like this one in the underlying report illustrate what I'm talking about
https://www.car.org/en/aboutus/mediacenter/newsreleases/2018releases/2qtrhousingaffordability
If you examine the numbers you'll see that housing affordability is pegged at 30% of annual income. The fallacy comes out when you start looking at what you do with the remaining 70%. While housing prices are 5x higher than the national average, I can guarantee you that other prices are nowhere near that multiplier. You'll see a similar skewing in things like a retirement calculator
Unfortunately, these measures ARE included in determining financing qualification, but I can't help but wonder how many people's personal decisions are based on these kinds of fixed percentages without accounting for the skew
In any case, it sure adds to the shock factor for headlines :laughing
https://www.sfgate.com/business/net...olds-could-afford-a-13141480.php?t=a2e07d569a
Only 18% of Bay Area households could afford a median-priced home
My point isn't to argue that housing costs aren't high. Rather I'm suggesting the conventional measures of housing affordability are inaccurate in markets where housing is drastically over or under priced. Statements like this one in the underlying report illustrate what I'm talking about
https://www.car.org/en/aboutus/mediacenter/newsreleases/2018releases/2qtrhousingaffordability
A minimum annual income of $126,490 was needed to make monthly payments of $3,160, including principal, interest, and taxes on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at a 4.70 percent interest rate.
If you examine the numbers you'll see that housing affordability is pegged at 30% of annual income. The fallacy comes out when you start looking at what you do with the remaining 70%. While housing prices are 5x higher than the national average, I can guarantee you that other prices are nowhere near that multiplier. You'll see a similar skewing in things like a retirement calculator
Unfortunately, these measures ARE included in determining financing qualification, but I can't help but wonder how many people's personal decisions are based on these kinds of fixed percentages without accounting for the skew
In any case, it sure adds to the shock factor for headlines :laughing