OMG - now I actually have to think instead of post platitudes. Curse you!!!
Would people agree that thoughts precede actions?
And if the above were true, would they agree that social media influences thought?
I think that social media has created artificial tribes that supercede previous tribes.
^^ That was original question.
Definitely not, or definitely not as any sort of generalization without some really heavy filters.
^^ That was one answer.
My assertions, or other folks?
If you disagree with my 3 assertions, please explain how a thought cannot precede a conscious action?
:cool
^^ That was me trying to figure out which of my three assertions was being referred to.
It looks like you're making a lot of generalizations about the influence of social media based on how your friend or friends are reacting to it.
^^ That resulted in me going slightly off topic and explaining why I think that social media influences thought (and thought, action).
The simple proposition that you previously supposed does not capture the above.
Your original question, "does thought precede action," implies a predetermined process of analysis and commitment to decision prior to behavior, which I would be inclined to agree with Byke is uncommon.
Your following supportive material is one that much more intends to suppose thought not as a rational and active process but more a shaping of the subconscious by numerous factors to help direct the unanalyzed impulse Byke is calling out.
I agree with this. I should have clarified what I meant by thought. It's my position that
conscious thought is the result of
unconscious thought. Kind of like how the ID (Freud) or the shadow (Jung) might influence thought, then action.
Either they do, or they cannot? Pass. :laughing
LOL, they cannot cannot - otherwise we would actually be the robots.
---------
Example - and this is from some work that Edward Bernays did with the folks who made Betty Crocker cake mix in the 1950's. The company was not getting the sales that it expected. They convened some focus groups (which was a Bernays invention). The women (since women did most baking back in the 1950's) said they didn't feel like they were putting enough of "themselves" into the mix when they made it for their families.
It was just sugar, powdered egg, powdered milk, some flavorings, and flour. It was too easy. Bernays suggested to General Mills (or whomever) that they take out SOME of the powdered egg and make the recipe to where you have to put in a
single real egg.
That's basically hard-core, once you see what he did. He knew from Sigmund Freud (a close relative) that people will do things from unconscious desires. He made the mix so that women were putting part of themselves, metaphorically - into it.
Sales took off after this. Only people in the marketing and PR professions even know about this kind of stuff, BTW. It's a dark art. That's again why the guy who basically invented G4W (Generation IV Warfare, Mindwar) was also the founder of Temple of Set (which was an offshoot from Church of Satan). And by dark, I
don't mean evil. Rather, I mean amoral.
https://heavy.com/news/2020/07/michael-aquino/
Now realize that egg thing was over 70 years ago. It's basically that level of manipulation, times about a million, IMHO - now. The best defense against this kind of stuff is realizing that it's real, and that people make money from it.
ETA: hopefully I stayed on topic! I get diverted. Please let me know if that's responsive to the questions or points that have been raised, etc. . .