Guy Martin's recent incident at IOMTT brought up something that's confused me for a while: what are the functional differences between engine braking and braking with the pedal?
Intuitively they seem very similar -- and exactly the same in toy force models i can picture -- but neutral+pedal feels more out of control to me than always having the engine engaged, whether I'm driving a car or riding a bike. Then there's Guy Martin's crash.
I guess I can accept that having the engine engaged will help keep the rear wheel spinning at a more consistent rate when performing aggressive, tire-smoking riding like guy does. But then why do I feel like I'm just a passenger when braking in neutral during my dopey beginner/intermediate riding?
What's going on here? Why could Guy Martin not pedal-brake his way out of that scenario? Was it a matter of not having enough time to adjust his braking method? Is my feeling of being out of control just unfamiliarity with the effects of the controls when in neutral, or is there really something substantial that is lost?
Intuitively they seem very similar -- and exactly the same in toy force models i can picture -- but neutral+pedal feels more out of control to me than always having the engine engaged, whether I'm driving a car or riding a bike. Then there's Guy Martin's crash.
I guess I can accept that having the engine engaged will help keep the rear wheel spinning at a more consistent rate when performing aggressive, tire-smoking riding like guy does. But then why do I feel like I'm just a passenger when braking in neutral during my dopey beginner/intermediate riding?
What's going on here? Why could Guy Martin not pedal-brake his way out of that scenario? Was it a matter of not having enough time to adjust his braking method? Is my feeling of being out of control just unfamiliarity with the effects of the controls when in neutral, or is there really something substantial that is lost?
Last edited: