Another reason to delete your social media accounts...

kevin 714

Well-known member
Buddys uncle, same thing. Married a woman who Alresdy had a kid, divorced years later and now pays support for that kid.
 

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User
How is that even possible? So now the mother of the children is collecting child support from two people?
 
Last edited:

greggargubby

Back For More
You know, all jokes aside, this thread is an example of the value of the KS. I'd be willing to bet that just about every single guy that's ever found himself on the hook for a kid that's not his got there without knowing it was going to happen. I would have never thought of it. But now I know. I wouldn't go so far as to say I would never date a woman with children, but I doubt I'd shack up with one after reading this thread.
 

kevin 714

Well-known member
How is that even possible? So now the mother of the children is collecting child support from two people?

My guess is her lawyer was better than his. Honestly I really don't know. Dude got royally f'd in the divorce. Put her through medical/nursing school, supported her and the kid a ton. Then she starts raking in the dough, leaves him, And gets CS for the kid that isn't his


In high school one of my best friends decided to live With his dad (parents were divorced). He lives with his dad full time from ages 15-18 but his dad is still required to pay the mom child support. Lol he lives full time with the dad!
 
Last edited:

Marlowe

Beer Whisperer
I'm not sure why this is a reason to delete accounts...because it can be used to post legal notices?

Seems to be throwing out the baby with the bathwater. :dunno

Kev, it was a joke. :)

Other Kev:

Lawyer doesn't have to be better; the family court system is willing to work very hard to ensure that someone, anyone, is fiscally responsible for the child...rather than the state.

Shack up with a single mom for a couple of years and treat the kids okay? Dudes have been put on the hook for that.

Get told that a kid is yours, and don't demand a paternity test within a couple of years? That has also put people on the hook. Even if you can subsequently prove it, too late, you accepted the kid as yours and it's your problem.

It's actually a pretty sad state of affairs, because I don't think we should be encouraging men to exclude single moms from their dating pool.
 

Ogier le Danois

Well-known member
You know, all jokes aside, this thread is an example of the value of the KS. I'd be willing to bet that just about every single guy that's ever found himself on the hook for a kid that's not his got there without knowing it was going to happen. I would have never thought of it. But now I know. I wouldn't go so far as to say I would never date a woman with children, but I doubt I'd shack up with one after reading this thread.

The famous case put forth by John stossel
( yeah I know stossel) was one where the wife was having an affair and something like 2 of her 3 kids belonged to her lover not he spouse. In some states all kids born in a marriage are considered those if the husband. Despite knowing the kids were not genetically his the state deemed him on the hook for child support after the divorce.
 

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User
My guess is her lawyer was better than his. Honestly I really don't know. Dude got royally f'd in the divorce. Put her through medical/nursing school, supported her and the kid a ton. Then she starts raking in the dough, leaves him, And gets CS for the kid that isn't his


In high school one of my best friends decided to live With his dad (parents were divorced). He lives with his dad full time from ages 15-18 but his dad is still required to pay the mom child support. Lol he lives full time with the dad!

Can't even date bitches with kids anymore!! It's a cold game
 

Spec-ECU

required protocol
Some non-biological fathers can stipulate to paying child support for a child that isn't theirs. Why they would, I don't know.

Otherwise, if the matter went to court, given the circumstances, the court can deem a non-biological parent legally obligated to support a child, if the relationship between the two has been substantial enough for the child's well-being.
 
Top