ABS brakes mandated on motorcycles in 2016

metrorollah

OWHLY?
Well... in Europe at least, which will make export bikes ABS mandatory by reason of economics, if not by law. This is an article from the AMA journal, American Motorcyclist, February 2013. :thumbup
--
EUROPE MANDATING ANTI-LOCK BRAKES ON MOTORCYCLES
Could The United States Be Next?

The European Parliament has approved a proposal to require anti-lock braking
systems on all new motorcycles and trikes with engines larger than 125cc in Europe beginning in 2016.

Although the measure-adopted by a 643-to-16 vote, with 18 abstentions, on Nov. 20 in Brussels, Belgium-still needs to be adopted by each member nation of the European Union, approval is expected.

That means that-in the not-too-distant future-ASS could be on virtually all motorcycles models sold in the United States that are also available in Europe.

The AMA doesn't oppose ABS-the AMA recognizes the safety benefits of the
technology in most situations. However, the association has always maintained that ABS should be a rider's choice, must be affordable, and riders must be able to switch ABS on and off on dual-sport machines that are equipped with the technology.

The European Parliament's vote is a serious concern because of something called "global harmonization," which is a term for the process by which vehicles of all types-including motorcycles-are likely to be built to uniform standards worldwide.

Harmonization has advantages for manufacturers, who would be able to make just one version of a bike and sell it in every market. But it also has the potential to make vehicle standards passed in other parts of the world-like the European Union-the de facto law of the land here in the United States.

In 1998, representatives to the United Nations agreed to standardize vehicle technical regulations worldwide, including those covering motorcycle brakes.

On Aug. 24, 2012, the U.S. Transportation Department issued its final rule on motorcycle brake systems safety standards, in part, "to harmonize with a global technical regulation (GTR) for motorcycle brakes.

"The GTR was developed under the United Nations 1998 Global Agreement with the U.S. as an active participant, and it was derived from various motorcycle braking regulations from around the world, including the U.S. motorcycle brake systems standard," the final rule said.

While that final rule is very technical and really doesn't impact motorcyclists, it shows how the global harmonization process works, and it shows how decisions made in Europe could impact riders in the United States.

But U.S. officials don't need to wait for a global technical standard requiring ABS systems on new bikes to mandate it. They could simply make a rule, and that's what the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety wants them to do.

The IIHS has said it is "seeking a federal requirement that manufacturers equip all new motorcycles with this "technology" and "NHTSA [the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration] has what it needs [in terms of research] to move forward with a regulation." While NHTSA so far hasn't indicated it is moving in that direction, the European Parliament vote may cause the U.S. agency to reconsider.

-AMA
 

louemc

Well-known member
It's easier to believe that ABS will be on bikes, than option to be on.

Look who is making the laws..Suits. Do the Insurance brokers ride a motorcycle?

Does a manufacturer want the expense of having separate assembly line runs, for this option?

I'm so giddy happy that I bought my ZX-10 the year before the changes were starting to come in, to calm it down, and then computer managed controls to protect the rider from themselves.
 

Albal0ney

Hella Legit
I don't see any obvious downsides. If they only manufacture an ABS trim, that should cut costs to us as well.
 

Stormdragon

Still Good Lookin'
I don't see any obvious downsides. If they only manufacture an ABS trim, that should cut costs to us as well.

I do: complexity. 'Gee, I wonder which part of my now integrated braking system is why the brakes aren't working optimally?'
 

VicTim

VMCSF
I was against the electric starter over the kick start. You can really feel how the engine performs when kick starting as opposed to just pressing a button. Wheres the skill in that.:thumbdown
 

clutchslip

Not as fast as I look.
I do: complexity. 'Gee, I wonder which part of my now integrated braking system is why the brakes aren't working optimally?'
In addition, it has already been covered on barf that ABS is bad for trail braking, or braking while leaned over at all. You can stick ABS in your fanny, if you think I will sacrifice corner safety for straight line safety.
 

louemc

Well-known member
Maybe GAJ will chime in on this..
Detailing how his brakes quit braking on his BMW, when his rear wheel lifted from going over a bump...
while he was slowing to a stop.

And how BMW responded.
 

Tharkûn

Freeway Moderator
In addition, it has already been covered on barf that ABS is bad for trail braking, or braking while leaned over at all. You can stick ABS in your fanny, if you think I will sacrifice corner safety for straight line safety.

I do it in every corner on a 1150 1200 and the concours, not an issue

Maybe GAJ will chime in on this..
Detailing how his brakes quit braking on his BMW, when his rear wheel lifted from going over a bump...
while he was slowing to a stop.

And how BMW responded.

Happens everyday, not an issue
 

Tharkûn

Freeway Moderator
Really. Well, what the heck was that long thread about it not working? Earlier versions, or what?

Don't know, I don't remember reading that anywhere else, but sometimes I can't keep up with how long winded those ABS threads get. I don't trail brake to the extent of someone running in A group, but I'll speed adjust with it while I'm nearly scraping peg
 

JO EBRMC

Is idjut
I'm totally fine with this with one concern: I need to be able to turn it off.

I don't spend a lot of time on dirt roads but I do regularly take my streetbikes on them. I need to be able to manage braking traction in the dirt and ABS simply can't do that.
 

MysterYvil

Mr. Bad Example
I'm totally fine with this with one concern: I need to be able to turn it off.

I don't spend a lot of time on dirt roads but I do regularly take my streetbikes on them. I need to be able to manage braking traction in the dirt and ABS simply can't do that.
This, for me as well.
 

unhinged

unsatisficed
I'm normally against vehicle safety regulations. Regulators preen themselves about how cars are safer now but they forget that they would be anyway with or without their rules because technology gets better and people consider safety when choosing a product.

The ones that affect other people though are important (bumpers, lights) and operating safety like mirrors and functional brakes. ABS is debatable because it might prevent some other idiot from wiping you out. Which is more convincing than theoretically saving my own ass.
 

Spensersdad

I yam what I yam
The only objection I have is the physical size of the ABS unit on my ST3. It makes removal of the rear shock a real PITA. Some of the new systems are quite compact though.
 

kurth83

Well-known member
I won't buy a bike without ABS so for me it will open up a lot of new bikes to think about. :)
I agree about being able to turn it off for off-roading, will wait and see. :popcorn
 

Daks

Jersey Devil
As a boring straight -line city and highway rider, ABS is a nice feature, but it needs to be optional or switchable for all the other riders out there. It ain't just about me. Bikes aren't like cars, where apparently anyone with 3 neurons firing is allowed to drive and most do it out of laziness/necessity so they need to be protected from themselves.
 

fast4d

Well-known member
I don't think I'll buy another bike without ABS. I ride in rain and some horrible broken roads so it is great insurance.
 
Top