:laughing
I've always thought that it's okay to run tires slightly different from stock sizing as long as there are no clearance issues.
There is quite a difference in height between a 120/70 and a 120/90.
And now I have to share my story related to that... :afm199
Back in 1985 I had an RZ-350 which took a 110/80-18 rear tire. Once that was worn out the guys at the Yamaha shop talked me into a 120/90-18 rear. It's just one size bigger in each dimension, right?
So when I'm on the freeway it won't go over about 65 mph and there's a bunch of smoke behind. Oh well, it's a 2-stroke, they smoke right? After a week or two of that I realized that at speed the tire was expanding and hitting the swingarm. The faster I tried to go the more it expanded and "put on the brake", so to speak. By the time I realized this I had already worn about a 2" wide flat section into the tire and where it was hitting the swingarm you could make out where the center groove was, because the paint and metal hadn't been worn down there.
Eventually the tire was worn enough for it to no longer be an issue, but I felt pretty stupid about it.
So when you're considering a bigger tire than the manufacturer recommends, there are multiple reasons why going bigger by more than one size might not work. Somebody recently wanted to put a 150 rear on an XR650L which comes stock with a 120. You can get away with a 140 on some tire brands, but others even at that size will hit the swingarm.