wannabe
"Insignificant Other"
I was just having a conversation with my god daughter, and I came to the conclusion that a lot of people have a different set point regarding how far their definition of 'in-law' goes.
For example, my sister's husband is my brother in-law. Nobody disputes that. The dispute is related to how far that goes:
1. Is my sister's husband's sister also my in-law?
2. If so, would her husband also be my in-law?
3. If so, would his sister be my sister in-law?
4. etc...
For simplicity, I have decided to just stop at my sister's husband being my brother in-law. Everyone else is his relative in my book.
Where do you draw the line?
For example, my sister's husband is my brother in-law. Nobody disputes that. The dispute is related to how far that goes:
1. Is my sister's husband's sister also my in-law?
2. If so, would her husband also be my in-law?
3. If so, would his sister be my sister in-law?
4. etc...
For simplicity, I have decided to just stop at my sister's husband being my brother in-law. Everyone else is his relative in my book.
Where do you draw the line?