Re-read the original article. It's full of suppositions and assumptions, and light on actual evidence.
E.g.
"Appropriately titled FLIXPAC, the just established-agency will be able to endorse (not ARE endorsing) politicians by way of stuffing their pockets, which in turn could (again, not ARE) influence even more congressmen to condone increasingly controversial bills that are being considered in the House and the Senate. "
It carries on, it's just assuming that they'll do all these terrible things.
Which might be true.
But the fat lady hasn't sung yet.