OK LEOS, the question may be naive but I'm going to ask anyhow:
Do you give a "margin of tolerance" to speeders?
Now, I realize school zones, special event crowds, traffic weaving and "look at me" loud and obnoxious behaviors are provocations; I'm talking about either general traffic flow that's (all) faster that posted limits and rural (light traffic) environments where riders are riding spiritedly but not crossing "the line" (I mean evidently racing or endangering others.)
What "plays" into a degree of "tolerance", if any?
*- Are Hyper-Sports and racing suits on the street more likely to get less "slack"?
*- Say you "light up" a rider, his record checks out and he's courteous and honest: Is there a "threshold" over the posted limit where you'd give the rider a warning or at least some slack?
*- Say you spot a radar detector: Does that make you "smirk and ignore" or is that additional provocation to cite the "poor ignorant speeder"?
So, just to be clear, none of this is intended to encourage breaking the law but rather to get a perspective from the enforcement side: i don't adhere to speed limits always, it's clear most riders will push that threshold. The question is about "tolerance", when is the line being crossed sufficiently to warrant "The Talk"?
Do you give a "margin of tolerance" to speeders?
Now, I realize school zones, special event crowds, traffic weaving and "look at me" loud and obnoxious behaviors are provocations; I'm talking about either general traffic flow that's (all) faster that posted limits and rural (light traffic) environments where riders are riding spiritedly but not crossing "the line" (I mean evidently racing or endangering others.)
What "plays" into a degree of "tolerance", if any?
*- Are Hyper-Sports and racing suits on the street more likely to get less "slack"?
*- Say you "light up" a rider, his record checks out and he's courteous and honest: Is there a "threshold" over the posted limit where you'd give the rider a warning or at least some slack?
*- Say you spot a radar detector: Does that make you "smirk and ignore" or is that additional provocation to cite the "poor ignorant speeder"?
So, just to be clear, none of this is intended to encourage breaking the law but rather to get a perspective from the enforcement side: i don't adhere to speed limits always, it's clear most riders will push that threshold. The question is about "tolerance", when is the line being crossed sufficiently to warrant "The Talk"?