Yakoo752
USN
Bumping this with a very silicon valley question.
Taking all this to my tax guy soon, but he's a bit busy this time of year.
IANATL but I have experienced similar.
You didn't pay tax at $30. You paid the tax on the difference of fair market value and what you paid. In your 2:20 example, the tax basis would be $18. And you're 3:30 calculation is "wrong"
After a 3-for-2 stock split, you'll have three shares for every two shares you used to own. The company will increase its share count by half, and its share price should correspondingly decline by approximately one-third. The market value of your holding therefore remains more-or-less the same.
a split shouldn't change your overall cost basis so that's a moot point. In total, you paid X amount and it was valued at Y amount. You were taxed on the difference. When you sell, you earned Z amount. If Z is greater than Y, you owe more taxes. If less than Y, you can claim the loss.
If I am incorrect, please follow up with what your tax person indicates.
Also, have you been writing off your AMT? If so, that will change things as well.
Last edited: