Should the Federal government help Texans hit by extremely high energy bills?

Should the users with extremely high energy bills get bailed out by the Federal government?

  • Hell Yes!

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • Yes

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • No

    Votes: 11 28.9%
  • Hell No!

    Votes: 19 50.0%
  • What's gforce talking about, mate?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    38

wazzuFreddo

WuTang is 4 the children
I think this situation is newer in Texas than here. What ERCOT really needs to do is blow up a town and kill some people, just to show Texas they are not fucking around. Then just annually burn down half of Texas and kill a bunch more people every year. Once the State knows they are not to be fucked with, that way they can just declare bankruptcy and get relief from the State and they won't have to fix any infrastructure.

That's Gangsta.

lol, they need to defer at least two decades of maintenance to pay out investors and executives before they do that tho :laughing
 

wazzuFreddo

WuTang is 4 the children
You could give us your readers digest version. :)

It is sold mostly as the power to chose to let market forces dictate the energy price, and that price is tied really close to natural gas markets since that is the dominant energy source in ERCOT. So much so that when I was building wind farms we would enter into a natural gas hedge to make up for not being able to enter into a PPA (power purchase agreement) with a utility. Natural gas pipelines freezing were part of the driver behind price spikes, I hear they are also looking into some of the market signal systems that they use in forward markets. We will see how that shakes out.

But since ERCOT lacks links to other interconnections, they can't import energy from other areas. For example here in California, if there is a shortage in the CAISO market the ISO can import energy from the SMUD control area, the southwest or the northwest to make up for the reserve shortfall. Texas can't do that.

Also, we have cheaper hydro power in the NW to thank for at least a little bit of downward pressure on our utility bills. Not a ton due to there being physical limitations of the intertie between here and the NW but still more than there would be if those links didn't exist.

I work in a completely different industry now. Still power stuff, just not for a utility or a generator.
 

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User
I just don't understand the point. There's only one transmission and utility provider in my area. Why the f*ck are there 10 different companies I can purchase that power from that singular provider from?

They pretty much put in place a bunch of middle men for the sake of competitiveness when all the power is still coming from the same place.

Correct me if i'm wrong wazzu, ur wheel house for sure.
 

wazzuFreddo

WuTang is 4 the children
I just don't understand the point. There's only one transmission and utility provider in my area. Why the f*ck are there 10 different companies I can purchase that power from that singular provider from?

They pretty much put in place a bunch of middle men for the sake of competitiveness when all the power is still coming from the same place.

Correct me if i'm wrong wazzu, ur wheel house for sure.

Physically, yes. Contractually no.

Sure you may be getting the actual electrons from the natural gas plant up the road but you could have a contract for a purchase of wind power up in the panhandle that is physically used somewhere between there and Houston.

It is a sort of a shell game with multiple middle men. Kind of like my internet provider, I pay sonic.net for the service but they buy it in bulk off of AT&T, use AT&T infrastructure and layer their own T&C/Customer Service on top.
 

Karbon

Hyper hoñorary
on that rugged individualism bullshit. God i hope this isn't real.
https://i.redd.it/z3pyttvtv0j61.jpg
z3pyttvtv0j61.jpg



I mean a lot of it is
https://www.npr.org/sections/live-u...-texas-residents-now-face-huge-electric-bills
 
Last edited:

JesasaurusRex

Deleted User

wazzuFreddo

WuTang is 4 the children
Yeh, if you live in Texas, turn off the auto pay on your utilities for sure.

It's way easier to say "I'm not paying" than it is to try and get your money back.
 

Killroy1999

Well-known member
"Customers on certain types of plans will be devastated, but almost all of our customers are on fixed plans, which will see a small increase for the month,"

I wonder what "most" mean?

You think that with the power of the free market and deregulation the energy companies would be encouraged to be ready to capitalize on the high energy rates. Nope. They suck.
 

asdfghwy

Well-known member
as a current texan (fixed rate), there were a lot of people affected and hurt by this that I personally know - not just bill relate. They aren't all the ideology everyone is touting here. Not helping innocent people to make a political point seems kinda dumb. If there were a way for the feds to force abbot and his cronies to pay up, I'd be all for it.

also fyi -
Electric Reliability Council of Texas which is in charge of this whole fiasco has like 5 board members who dont even live in texas, with one being in canada.. if that tells you about how things are run in abbots kingdom.
 
Last edited:

berth

Well-known member
The fundamental issue is that, regardless of the contract, I doubt anyone, the consumers or the producers, had any inkling this would happen.

This is a computer managed price spike. Everybody woke up that morning with a whole lot of WTH spread on their toast. I'm curious if anyone had the option to cap the price they would pay, or if that was even a feature offered by the company.

The company just passed it through, as is their obligation.

But it's wrong on all levels.
 

asdfghwy

Well-known member
The fundamental issue is that, regardless of the contract, I doubt anyone, the consumers or the producers, had any inkling this would happen.

This is a computer managed price spike. Everybody woke up that morning with a whole lot of WTH spread on their toast. I'm curious if anyone had the option to cap the price they would pay, or if that was even a feature offered by the company.

The company just passed it through, as is their obligation.

But it's wrong on all levels.

I think this is what people are missing.This isn't people gambling on fixed rates and paying double, or even triple for bad weather - we're talking 10,000% rate spikes in a state of emergency.
 

wazzuFreddo

WuTang is 4 the children
To be clear, I don’t want a bailout to be the feds covering people bills but canceling them out or setting them at something reasonable.

The energy companies billing those rates shouldn’t get a penny of the overages.
 
Top