Eldritch
is insensitive
It is though. Neutrality helps the oppressor. Neutrality is tacit approval.
Fundamentally disagree. Your statemetn seems to assume that 100% participation is required in the social contract, which is untrue. There is probably no path forward on this disagreement as it appears to be fundamental. Neutral positions are not conflict positions.
No dude, everyone is annoyed that Desi rolled in, pretended to be clueless and didn't read one word of a huge thread before he asked a disingenuous "question." Desi is displaying his typical behavior for which he is being rightfully roasted. You're in deep, deep roving right field here man. Probably because you don't go into the poly sink and see this is his M.O. on the regular.
No, clearly everyone is not. :dunno
This.
Eldritch, you're wrong. Either he skipped the entire thread purposely showing ignorance, or he's supportive of racist hatred which wouldn't surprise me based on his past posts.
What? He questioned the guys impact, that is not in any way supportive of racist hatred. That is like saying that the Supreme Court is supporting Racist Hatred by allowing the Illinois Nazis.
Which gets to the root of the matter. People who present positions like yours seems to be seeking the fascist agenda and a desire to no longer allow hate speech to be protected speech. You seem to be content to stand with the other book burners of history.
Last edited: