Rush Limbaugh...dead

Eldritch

is insensitive
It is though. Neutrality helps the oppressor. Neutrality is tacit approval.

Fundamentally disagree. Your statemetn seems to assume that 100% participation is required in the social contract, which is untrue. There is probably no path forward on this disagreement as it appears to be fundamental. Neutral positions are not conflict positions.

No dude, everyone is annoyed that Desi rolled in, pretended to be clueless and didn't read one word of a huge thread before he asked a disingenuous "question." Desi is displaying his typical behavior for which he is being rightfully roasted. You're in deep, deep roving right field here man. Probably because you don't go into the poly sink and see this is his M.O. on the regular.

No, clearly everyone is not. :dunno

This.

Eldritch, you're wrong. Either he skipped the entire thread purposely showing ignorance, or he's supportive of racist hatred which wouldn't surprise me based on his past posts.

What? He questioned the guys impact, that is not in any way supportive of racist hatred. That is like saying that the Supreme Court is supporting Racist Hatred by allowing the Illinois Nazis.

Which gets to the root of the matter. People who present positions like yours seems to be seeking the fascist agenda and a desire to no longer allow hate speech to be protected speech. You seem to be content to stand with the other book burners of history.
 
Last edited:

KooLaid

Hippocritapotamus
No dude, everyone is annoyed that Desi rolled in, pretended to be clueless and didn't read one word of a huge thread before he asked a disingenuous "question." Desi is displaying his typical behavior for which he is being rightfully roasted. You're in deep, deep roving right field here man. Probably because you don't go into the poly sink and see this is his M.O. on the regular.

How do you know he pretended? If you don't know something or curious about something, then you ask questions. All Desi did was ask questions, not make a pointed statement as most of you are.
 

HappyHighwayman

Warning: Do Not Engage
Fundamentally disagree. Your statemetn seems to assume that 100% participation is required in the social contract, which is untrue. There is probably no path forward on this disagreement as it appears to be fundamental. Neutral positions are not conflict positions.



No, clearly everyone is not. :dunno



What? He questioned the guys impact, that is not in any way supportive of racist hatred. That is like saying that the Supreme Court is supporting Racist Hatred by allowing the Illinois Nazis.

Which gets it to the root of the matter. People who present positions like yours seems to be seeking the fascist agenda and a desire to no longer allow hate speech to be protected speech. You seem to be content to stand with the other book burners of history.

Uh huh. You’re hilarious.
 

Mike95060

Work In Progress
How do you know he pretended? If you don't know something or curious about something, then you ask questions. All Desi did was ask questions, not make a pointed statement as most of you are.

No, clearly everyone is not. :dunno

You know what, you guys are totally right. Let's go for a ride and get some snacks at Desi's dads, uncles, brothers store. Coffee is on me.

Give us a date and a location Desi. can't wait to see ya! :thumbup
 

Eldritch

is insensitive
You know what, you guys are totally right. Let's go for a ride and get some snacks at Desi's dads, uncles, brothers store. Coffee is on me.

Give us a date and a location Desi. can't wait to see ya! :thumbup

I totally would. The sink seems to get worse and worse the farther away we have gotten from the old days of the Socials. Is there a way to coordinate this with COVID safety in mind?
 

Mike95060

Work In Progress
I totally would. The sink seems to get worse and worse the farther away we have gotten from the old days of the Socials. Is there a way to coordinate this with COVID safety in mind?

I agree. Super down for a parking lot 6' meet n greet.
 

mikev

»»───knee───►
What? He questioned the guys impact, that is not in any way supportive of racist hatred. That is like saying that the Supreme Court is supporting Racist Hatred by allowing the Illinois Nazis.

Which gets to the root of the matter. People who present positions like yours seems to be seeking the fascist agenda and a desire to no longer allow hate speech to be protected speech. You seem to be content to stand with the other book burners of history.

BARF has zero obligation to allow hate speech. In fact it violates TOS 4.1.a
 

Climber

Well-known member
What the KS really needs is a party like OFG's to get people face to face, especially the after hours activities to really see what people are like in all their glory. :laughing
 

HappyHighwayman

Warning: Do Not Engage
BARF has zero obligation to allow hate speech. In fact it violates TOS 4.1.a

Exactly,


I love it! We're repressing free speech and are fascists because people face consequences for saying stupid fucking ignorant shit.

Any other tropes you guys want to try out?

Not all viewpoints are equal. We don't need to tolerate intolerance or purposeful ignorance.
 

KooLaid

Hippocritapotamus
You know what, you guys are totally right. Let's go for a ride and get some snacks at Desi's dads, uncles, brothers store. Coffee is on me.

Give us a date and a location Desi. can't wait to see ya! :thumbup

I hope they carry some good snacks. I don't want any of that basic 711 junk if I'm making a long trek.

I've been kinda addicted to these lately. It's a weird drink, starts off with a taste of coke, goes to a nice coffee and ends with coke. tasty.

e638be9b-532e-431b-936f-7d111a1324c5_1.771511909b9769358713a1f7644b5df2.jpeg
 

tzrider

Write Only User
Staff member
How do you know he pretended? If you don't know something or curious about something, then you ask questions. All Desi did was ask questions, not make a pointed statement as most of you are.

This is exactly right.

It's helpful to distinguish between what occurred (observably) and what we think about what occurred. What occurred is Desi asked questions. What some of you think is that it implies a defense. The latter is you inducing meaning onto what occurred. You might be right and you might not be.

As far as I can tell, Desi is a guy who doesn't know as much about this culture as many of you do. His questions might well be genuine. If you assume they are rhetorical, then you'd reach the conclusions you have. But that's on you.

I have my own opinions about all this but I'll keep them to myself. In the meantime, I'm trying to take Desi's posts at face value.
 
Top